Bunny.net VS AWS Storage Gateway

I wanted to migrate a static website from a VPS to a CDN to improve website loading time and SEO performance. After a few searches, I discovered a new sleek CDN called BunnyCDN, which beats all performance charts in latency with an average of 40ms. That's what I was looking for! - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

This is great news. Now I can utilize any CDN provider that supports S3. Like bunny.net [1] which has image optimization, just like Supabase does but with better pricing and features. I have been developing with Supabase past two months. I would say there are still some rough corners in general and some basic features missing. Example Supabase storage has no direct support for metadata [2][3]. Overall I like the... - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago

It seems there's no discord community yet for bunny.net, would someone be interested in setting this up? Source: 5 months ago

Use a CDN like Bunny and you can host images for like $1/mo + less than $0.10/gb of bandwidth. Source: 6 months ago

You'll want a CDN like Bunny (at least for the files), instead of a web host. Source: 7 months ago

Could Storage Gateway help here? EC2 fronts the FTP endpoint to a file server that is Storage Gateway? Source: over 1 year ago

One option is https://aws.amazon.com/storagegateway/ (plus VPN). Source: over 1 year ago

That helps, thank you. You might have a look at AWS' Storage Gateway, more specifically the S3 File Gateway. Source: over 1 year ago

I *think* storage gateway can do this (https://aws.amazon.com/storagegateway/). Also, several of the Amazon FSx services can, I think. They all basically mean you have a remote file system to which you write, and that file system gets backed up to FSx. Source: almost 2 years ago

You can deploy Storage gateway in your local environment, and copy the files to storage gateway, it will automatically sync the files to s3. Source: over 2 years ago