Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bun.sh VS Preact.js

Compare Bun.sh VS Preact.js and see what are their differences

Bun.sh logo Bun.sh

Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Preact.js logo Preact.js

Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.
  • Bun.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-11

Bun is a new JavaScript runtime built from scratch to serve the modern JavaScript ecosystem. It has three major design goals:

  1. Speed. Bun starts fast and runs fast. It extends JavaScriptCore, the performance-minded JS engine built for Safari. As computing moves to the edge, this is critical.

  2. Elegant APIs. Bun provides a minimal set of highly-optimimized APIs for performing common tasks, like starting an HTTP server and writing files.

  3. Cohesive DX. Bun is a complete toolkit for building JavaScript apps, including a package manager, test runner, and bundler.

Bun is designed as a drop-in replacement for Node.js. It natively implements hundreds of Node.js and Web APIs, including fs, path, Buffer and more.

The goal of Bun is to run most of the world's server-side JavaScript and provide tools to improve performance, reduce complexity, and multiply developer productivity.

  • Preact.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11

Bun.sh features and specs

  • Speed
    Bun.sh is designed for performance and is optimized for running JavaScript and TypeScript quickly. This can lead to faster development cycles and more efficient runtime performance.
  • Built-in Tools
    Bun.sh comes with a built-in bundler, transpiler, and package manager. This reduces the need for additional tooling and simplifies the development setup.
  • TypeScript Support
    Bun.sh has native support for TypeScript, making it easier for developers who prefer strongly typed languages to work seamlessly without additional configuration.
  • Compatibility
    Bun aims to be compatible with existing npm packages, reducing friction in adopting it for existing projects.
  • Lower Resource Usage
    Bun is designed to use fewer resources compared to some traditional Node.js setups, which could lead to cost savings in a production environment.

Possible disadvantages of Bun.sh

  • Ecosystem Maturity
    Bun.sh is relatively new compared to established tools like Node.js and may lack the ecosystem maturity, comprehensive documentation, and community support available for more established platforms.
  • Adoption Risk
    Early adoption of new technology can be risky. As Bun.sh is still evolving, there might be breaking changes or unstable features in future releases.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers who are accustomed to traditional Node.js environments might face a learning curve when adjusting to Bun.sh’s different approach and built-in tools.
  • Debugging and Error Handling
    Given its relative youth, Bun.sh might not yet have the robust debugging tools and error handling practices that more mature ecosystems provide.
  • Platform-Specific Issues
    There may be platform-specific issues or limitations, especially in less common development environments, which might require workarounds or lead to inconsistent behavior.

Preact.js features and specs

  • Size
    Preact is very small in size (about 3KB gzipped), which makes it easy to load and faster to execute, resulting in improved performance and quicker load times.
  • Compatibility
    Preact is largely compatible with React, allowing developers to switch to Preact with minimal code changes. This makes it easier to adopt for projects already using React.
  • Performance
    Due to its small size and efficient design, Preact offers excellent performance, especially on low-powered devices and in applications with heavy user interactions.
  • Ecosystem
    Preact can work with many tools and libraries that are designed for React, giving developers access to a rich ecosystem of resources.
  • Community
    Preact has an active and growing community that provides support, plugins, and third-party tools, making it easier for developers to find solutions and share knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Preact.js

  • Feature Set
    While Preact covers most of the core React features, it lacks some of the advanced functionality present in React, which may require additional workarounds or third-party libraries.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from a non-React background, learning Preact might involve a learning curve, particularly because of its similarities and subtle differences with React.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Although many tools designed for React can work with Preact, some might not be directly compatible, requiring additional configuration or patches.
  • Community Size
    While Preact has a supportive community, it is smaller compared to the massive React community, which can result in fewer available resources and third-party packages.
  • Maturity
    Preact, being newer and less widely adopted than React, might not have the same level of battle-tested reliability for all use cases, especially for large scale applications.

Bun.sh videos

No Bun.sh videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Preact.js videos

JS frameworks are replaceable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bun.sh and Preact.js)
JavaScript Runtime
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
JavaScript
63 63%
37% 37
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Bun.sh and Preact.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Bun.sh and Preact.js

Bun.sh Reviews

We have no reviews of Bun.sh yet.
Be the first one to post

Preact.js Reviews

Top JavaScript Frameworks in 2025
PreactJS is a JavaScript library that is said to be the fast 3Kb alternative to ReactJS using the same modern API. It implements the fastest virtual DOM compared to other frameworks in the market. Moreover, it is one of the smallest libraries in terms of size.
Source: solguruz.com
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
Preact is like React’s little sibling, smaller in size but with the same familiar moves. It’s cutting down the fluff and zipping through tasks with less overhead. When performance budgets are tight, Preact wiggles in perfectly.
20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Preact is built with the same core principle of React – A component-based approach with Virtual DOM while completely compatible with React. It can even use React packages without compromising on speed, performance, and leaner size. In instances where the full potential of React isn’t necessary, most developers even use React during development and switch to Preact for...
Top 15 jQuery Alternatives To Know
ReactJS is a powerful JavaScript library to create user interfaces. Developers can design easy views at each stage in the application and there is regular update and rendering for the actual components whenever there is any data alteration. It is component-driven and creates encapsulated components that manage their own state.
Top 5 JavaScript Frameworks To Learn in 2021
But according to the graph above, we can notice a decrease in interest in Preact. This might result from having many similar frameworks with the same specs, like react-lite, Inferno, etc. However, knowing a framework like Preact will be useful for your development journey.
Source: enlear.academy

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bun.sh should be more popular than Preact.js. It has been mentiond 201 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bun.sh mentions (201)

  • Rove : Straight up PostgreSQL migration.
    Rove is a fast, no-fluff migration manager for PostgreSQL built with Bun and TypeScript. It’s built for devs who just want to write raw SQL, version it in folders, and run it with confidence. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • 🚀 Switching from Node + Express to Hono + Bun and I’m not looking back.
    Let’s talk real — Express had its moment. But the dev world? It's moving fast. I recently jumped into building APIs using Hono (tiny, fast, edge-native framework) with Bun (next-gen JS runtime), and honestly... The experience is smooth, fast, type-safe, and just way more modern. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
  • Deno's Decline
    Https://bunny.net/ - a CDN, it has nothing to do with https://bun.sh/ as far as I can tell. - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
  • Flash-install
    Inspired by the speed of Bun, the reliability of Yarn, and the efficiency of PNPM. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
  • The Case for IRIS and JavaScript
    An early incarnation of server-side JavaScript was created by Netscape around the same time, but it wan't particularly successful.  It wasn't really until Ryan Dahl created Node.js in about 2010 that server-side JavaScript really took off and became "a thing".  More recently a serious competitor to Node.js - Bun - has emerged: its main advantage over Node.js is its stellar performance. - Source: dev.to / 27 days ago
View more

Preact.js mentions (93)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bun.sh and Preact.js, you can also consider the following products

Deno - A secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Node.js - Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

Inferno - An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.