Bulma

Website

bulma.io

$ Details

Categories

#CSS Framework #Development Tools #Design Tools #Developer Tools

react-testing-library

Website

testing-library.com

$ Details

-

Categories

#Developer Tools #JavaScript Framework #Testing #Automated Testing

Bulma features and specs

• Simple and Elegant Design
  Bulma offers a clean, modern aesthetic that looks great out of the box. This eliminates much of the need for extensive customization to achieve a professional look.
• Responsive Layouts
  Bulma is built with a flexible grid system that ensures your designs are responsive. This makes it straightforward to create web pages that look great on both desktop and mobile devices.
• Ease of Use
  Bulma has a straightforward class-based syntax that is easy to understand and implement. This simplifies the development process, especially for newcomers.
• BEM Methodology
  Bulma employs Block Element Modifier (BEM) methodology for CSS, which helps in writing clean, understandable, and scalable code.
• No JavaScript Dependencies
  Bulma is purely a CSS framework, meaning it doesn't come bundled with JavaScript. This allows you to integrate it with any JavaScript framework of your choice, like React or Vue.js, without any conflicts.
• Well-Documented
  The official Bulma website has extensive documentation, including examples and code snippets, which makes it easier to learn and implement.
• Active Community
  Bulma has an active community of developers who contribute to its development and are available for support, which can be helpful when facing issues or needing guidance.

Possible disadvantages of Bulma

• Limited Customizability
  While Bulma is designed to be easy to use, its simplicity can sometimes limit your ability to customize components as deeply as you might be able to with other frameworks.
• Lack of Components
  Bulma does not come with as many built-in components as some other CSS frameworks like Bootstrap. You might find yourself needing to create custom components for some features.
• No JavaScript
  The lack of built-in JavaScript functionality means you will need to write or integrate JavaScript separately for more interactive elements, such as modals or carousels.
• Performance Overhead
  Like most CSS frameworks, using Bulma can introduce some performance overhead due to unused CSS. You'll need to use a tool like PurgeCSS to remove unused styles for optimal performance.
• Learning Curve
  Despite its simplicity, there can still be a learning curve for developers who are accustomed to other frameworks like Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS.
• Small Community compared to Others
  While the community is active, it is smaller compared to more established frameworks like Bootstrap, potentially making it harder to find solutions to less common issues.
• Semantic Class Names
  Bulma emphasizes semantic class names following the BEM methodology, which can be verbose and may require a change in practice for some developers.

react-testing-library features and specs

• Focused on user-centric testing
  React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
• Reduces coupling to implementation details
  By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
• Improved test readability
  Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
• Comprehensive query options
  The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
• Active community and well-maintained
  React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

• Limited support for non-DOM testing
  The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
• Can be slower
  Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
• Learning curve for traditional testers
  Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
• Potential for less granular control
  Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
• Dependencies on browser APIs
  The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

S.H. Figuarts BULMA Dragon Ball Action Figure Review

More videos:

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos: