Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Bulma VS Cardinal CSS

Compare Bulma VS Cardinal CSS and see what are their differences

Limey
Limey: Connect smarter with QR codes, links, sites, and digital business cards in one place. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Bulma logo Bulma

Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.

Cardinal CSS logo Cardinal CSS

Cardinal is a modular, “mobile-first” CSS framework for front-end web developers. It’s built with performance and scalability in mind.
  • Bulma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-14
  • Cardinal CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-06

Bulma features and specs

  • Simple and Elegant Design
    Bulma offers a clean, modern aesthetic that looks great out of the box. This eliminates much of the need for extensive customization to achieve a professional look.
  • Responsive Layouts
    Bulma is built with a flexible grid system that ensures your designs are responsive. This makes it straightforward to create web pages that look great on both desktop and mobile devices.
  • Ease of Use
    Bulma has a straightforward class-based syntax that is easy to understand and implement. This simplifies the development process, especially for newcomers.
  • BEM Methodology
    Bulma employs Block Element Modifier (BEM) methodology for CSS, which helps in writing clean, understandable, and scalable code.
  • No JavaScript Dependencies
    Bulma is purely a CSS framework, meaning it doesn't come bundled with JavaScript. This allows you to integrate it with any JavaScript framework of your choice, like React or Vue.js, without any conflicts.
  • Well-Documented
    The official Bulma website has extensive documentation, including examples and code snippets, which makes it easier to learn and implement.
  • Active Community
    Bulma has an active community of developers who contribute to its development and are available for support, which can be helpful when facing issues or needing guidance.

Possible disadvantages of Bulma

  • Limited Customizability
    While Bulma is designed to be easy to use, its simplicity can sometimes limit your ability to customize components as deeply as you might be able to with other frameworks.
  • Lack of Components
    Bulma does not come with as many built-in components as some other CSS frameworks like Bootstrap. You might find yourself needing to create custom components for some features.
  • No JavaScript
    The lack of built-in JavaScript functionality means you will need to write or integrate JavaScript separately for more interactive elements, such as modals or carousels.
  • Performance Overhead
    Like most CSS frameworks, using Bulma can introduce some performance overhead due to unused CSS. You'll need to use a tool like PurgeCSS to remove unused styles for optimal performance.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its simplicity, there can still be a learning curve for developers who are accustomed to other frameworks like Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS.
  • Small Community compared to Others
    While the community is active, it is smaller compared to more established frameworks like Bootstrap, potentially making it harder to find solutions to less common issues.
  • Semantic Class Names
    Bulma emphasizes semantic class names following the BEM methodology, which can be verbose and may require a change in practice for some developers.

Cardinal CSS features and specs

  • Modular Design
    Cardinal CSS is built with a modular architecture that allows developers to include only the parts of the framework they need, reducing file size and improving performance.
  • Responsive Grid System
    The framework includes a built-in responsive grid system that helps in creating layouts that work well on various screen sizes without additional customization.
  • Minimalistic Style
    Cardinal CSS emphasizes a minimalistic approach, promoting simplicity in design and avoiding unnecessary complexity in styling.
  • Customizable
    Developers can easily customize the styles and components provided by Cardinal CSS to suit their specific design requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Cardinal CSS

  • Limited Components
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation, Cardinal CSS offers a more limited set of UI components and utilities, which might require additional custom development for complex interfaces.
  • Smaller Community
    Being less popular than some major CSS frameworks, Cardinal CSS has a smaller user community, which might result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations.
  • Lacking Advanced Features
    Cardinal CSS may not offer some advanced features and utilities present in larger frameworks, such as sophisticated JavaScript components or extensive theme options.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    For developers accustomed to other CSS frameworks, there might be a learning curve involved in understanding Cardinal CSS conventions and methodologies.

Bulma videos

+ Add

S.H. Figuarts BULMA Dragon Ball Action Figure Review

More videos:

  • Review - S.H. Figuarts Dragon Ball Adventure Begins Bulma Review
  • Review - Bandai SH Figuarts BULMA Review BR / DiegoHDM

Cardinal CSS videos

No Cardinal CSS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bulma and Cardinal CSS)

Bulma

Cardinal CSS

Design Tools
96 96%
Design Tools
4% 4
Developer Tools
92 92%
Developer Tools
8% 8
CSS Framework
96 96%
CSS Framework
4% 4
Development Tools
100 100%
Development Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Bulma and Cardinal CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Bulma and Cardinal CSS

Bulma Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
I chose Bulma for its efficient use of Flexbox, a layout model that allows a responsive design with minimal effort. This efficiency sets Bulma apart from many other CSS frameworks. In my judgment, Bulma stands out as the best choice for developers seeking a powerful, Flexbox-based CSS framework for creating flexible and intuitive web designs.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Suppose you want to learn the valuable skill of working with the mobile-first Bulma framework. In that case, we highly recommend taking the "Master Bulma CSS Framework" course by Jeppe Schaumburg Jensen on Udemy. In this course, you will master the latest version of Bulma and create real projects and themes while learning HTML, web design, and coding.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Bulma comes with a beautiful range of colors out-of-the-box, and it won’t be wrong if we call it the most beautiful framework out there in the market. It can be used directly to get really nice-looking websites with the very least effort.
Source: hackr.io
11 Best Material UI Alternatives
Bulma’s simplicity, extensive documentation, and community support make it a popular choice for projects of all sizes. Whether you’re building a landing page, a dashboard, or an eCommerce site, Bulma provides a solid foundation for building aesthetically pleasing and functional interfaces.
Source: www.uxpin.com
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Although new, Bulma has quickly climbed up the list of top 10 CSS frameworks. It has no JavaScript components (no .js) and the most readable CSS classes. To create grids, Bulma has a powerful system known as tiles, making the page elegant and neat. It is highly modular and easy to learn. Although small, Bulma has a community of passionate individuals wanting to change the...
Source: hackr.io

Cardinal CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
One of Cardinal's standout features is its commitment to giving developers full control over the planning and creativity of their projects. By eschewing numerous aesthetic design choices often found in other CSS frameworks, Cardinal offers a clean slate for developers to realize their vision, distinguishing it from mere UI toolboxes.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
The framework comes with a number of helper classes for quick application of styles upon an element, reducing development time. Cardinal also extends support to most modern browsers, such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Safari, iOS Safari, and Android. Its mobile-first approach and CSS Box model make it a perfect alternative to Bootstrap.
Source: hackr.io
Bootstrap Alternatives 2019: Advanced CSS Frameworks for Developers
Cardinal CSS framework is designed for high scalability, maintenance, and performance. Its mobile-first approach allows front-end developers to scale and build. The platform also helps it in maintaining CSS for responsive user interfaces, applications, and websites. Cardinal made to our list because it consciously omits several aesthetic design decisions which save its...
Source: www.technadu.com
15 Fabulous Alternatives to Bootstrap, Foundation and Skeleton
Cardinal is one of the best CSS framework used for prototyping. It keeps a mobile-first attitude. It is a modular, responsive and user-friendly framework.
Source: www.agriya.com
The 21 Most Used Bootstrap Alternatives
Cardinal is a modular, “mobile-first” CSS framework built with performance and scalability in mind. The purpose of this framework is to make it easier for front-end web developers to prototype, build, scale, and maintain CSS for responsive websites, user interfaces, and applications.
Source: designsparkle.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bulma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 115 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bulma mentions (115)

View more

Cardinal CSS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cardinal CSS yet. Tracking of Cardinal CSS recommendations started around Aug 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bulma and Cardinal CSS, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Purecss - A set of small, responsive CSS modules that you can use in every web project.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

UIKit - A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

Loading...