Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bulma VS Apache OpenWhisk

Compare Bulma VS Apache OpenWhisk and see what are their differences

Bulma logo Bulma

Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.

Apache OpenWhisk logo Apache OpenWhisk

Serverless / Task Processing
  • Bulma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-14
  • Apache OpenWhisk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-18

Bulma features and specs

  • Simple and Elegant Design
    Bulma offers a clean, modern aesthetic that looks great out of the box. This eliminates much of the need for extensive customization to achieve a professional look.
  • Responsive Layouts
    Bulma is built with a flexible grid system that ensures your designs are responsive. This makes it straightforward to create web pages that look great on both desktop and mobile devices.
  • Ease of Use
    Bulma has a straightforward class-based syntax that is easy to understand and implement. This simplifies the development process, especially for newcomers.
  • BEM Methodology
    Bulma employs Block Element Modifier (BEM) methodology for CSS, which helps in writing clean, understandable, and scalable code.
  • No JavaScript Dependencies
    Bulma is purely a CSS framework, meaning it doesn't come bundled with JavaScript. This allows you to integrate it with any JavaScript framework of your choice, like React or Vue.js, without any conflicts.
  • Well-Documented
    The official Bulma website has extensive documentation, including examples and code snippets, which makes it easier to learn and implement.
  • Active Community
    Bulma has an active community of developers who contribute to its development and are available for support, which can be helpful when facing issues or needing guidance.

Possible disadvantages of Bulma

  • Limited Customizability
    While Bulma is designed to be easy to use, its simplicity can sometimes limit your ability to customize components as deeply as you might be able to with other frameworks.
  • Lack of Components
    Bulma does not come with as many built-in components as some other CSS frameworks like Bootstrap. You might find yourself needing to create custom components for some features.
  • No JavaScript
    The lack of built-in JavaScript functionality means you will need to write or integrate JavaScript separately for more interactive elements, such as modals or carousels.
  • Performance Overhead
    Like most CSS frameworks, using Bulma can introduce some performance overhead due to unused CSS. You'll need to use a tool like PurgeCSS to remove unused styles for optimal performance.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its simplicity, there can still be a learning curve for developers who are accustomed to other frameworks like Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS.
  • Small Community compared to Others
    While the community is active, it is smaller compared to more established frameworks like Bootstrap, potentially making it harder to find solutions to less common issues.
  • Semantic Class Names
    Bulma emphasizes semantic class names following the BEM methodology, which can be verbose and may require a change in practice for some developers.

Apache OpenWhisk features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Bulma videos

S.H. Figuarts BULMA Dragon Ball Action Figure Review

More videos:

  • Review - S.H. Figuarts Dragon Ball Adventure Begins Bulma Review
  • Review - Bandai SH Figuarts BULMA Review BR / DiegoHDM

Apache OpenWhisk videos

A Tour of the New Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Project and Its Numerous Repositories - Matt Rutkowski

More videos:

  • Review - 2018-05-23 Apache OpenWhisk Tech Interchange - Web Meeting
  • Review - 2018-06-20 Apache OpenWhisk Tech Interchange - Zoom Meeting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bulma and Apache OpenWhisk)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
95 95%
5% 5
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Bulma and Apache OpenWhisk. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Bulma and Apache OpenWhisk

Bulma Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
I chose Bulma for its efficient use of Flexbox, a layout model that allows a responsive design with minimal effort. This efficiency sets Bulma apart from many other CSS frameworks. In my judgment, Bulma stands out as the best choice for developers seeking a powerful, Flexbox-based CSS framework for creating flexible and intuitive web designs.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Suppose you want to learn the valuable skill of working with the mobile-first Bulma framework. In that case, we highly recommend taking the "Master Bulma CSS Framework" course by Jeppe Schaumburg Jensen on Udemy. In this course, you will master the latest version of Bulma and create real projects and themes while learning HTML, web design, and coding.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Bulma comes with a beautiful range of colors out-of-the-box, and it won’t be wrong if we call it the most beautiful framework out there in the market. It can be used directly to get really nice-looking websites with the very least effort.
Source: hackr.io
11 Best Material UI Alternatives
Bulma’s simplicity, extensive documentation, and community support make it a popular choice for projects of all sizes. Whether you’re building a landing page, a dashboard, or an eCommerce site, Bulma provides a solid foundation for building aesthetically pleasing and functional interfaces.
Source: www.uxpin.com
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Although new, Bulma has quickly climbed up the list of top 10 CSS frameworks. It has no JavaScript components (no .js) and the most readable CSS classes. To create grids, Bulma has a powerful system known as tiles, making the page elegant and neat. It is highly modular and easy to learn. Although small, Bulma has a community of passionate individuals wanting to change the...
Source: hackr.io

Apache OpenWhisk Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache OpenWhisk yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bulma seems to be a lot more popular than Apache OpenWhisk. While we know about 115 links to Bulma, we've tracked only 7 mentions of Apache OpenWhisk. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bulma mentions (115)

View more

Apache OpenWhisk mentions (7)

  • The 2024 Web Hosting Report
    Serverless functions are now offered by many cloud providers, as well as having options like OpenFaaS, Knative, Apache's Openwhisk and more from the open source community that run in environments ranging from one server all the way up to globally replicated private clusters. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • My first serverless function on DigitalOcean
    The serverless functions with Digital Ocean are based on Apache Open Whisk, so the service has additional name space, which need to go into the URL. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • run a RestAPI on Every container?
    The two biggest options are OpenWhisk and OpenFaas. Check out /r/serverless for more options. I'm experimenting currently with OpenFaas as it's the lighter weigh to of the two. Source: over 2 years ago
  • which is best open source alternative to lamda
    If you meant lambda for cloud functions provided by Amazon then this is open source and free, as long as you host it yourself: https://openwhisk.apache.org/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Orchestrator self hosted
    Not necessarily an orchestrator, but you could take a look at https://openwhisk.apache.org/ it's like AWS Lambdas but for kubernetes (and open shift if you swing that way). Haven't used it personally, but the reading I've done on it suggests you could probably use it for this. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bulma and Apache OpenWhisk, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Dkron - Easy, Reliable Cron jobs A distributed Cron service with, API, no SPOF and an easy to use dashboard.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Lambada Framework - Build serverless REST API's with JAVA. It implements the JAX-RS API and deploys your application easily to AWS Lambda and API Gateway - cagataygurturk/lambadaframework

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Knative - Knative provides a set of components for building modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere.