Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BuildKit VS Google Open Source

Compare BuildKit VS Google Open Source and see what are their differences

BuildKit logo BuildKit

BuildKit is an open-source toolkit manager application that allows you to build the artifacts in a minimum time frame and helps you to gather the garbage automatically.

Google Open Source logo Google Open Source

All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella
  • BuildKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02
  • Google Open Source Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

BuildKit features and specs

  • Improved Caching
    BuildKit offers enhanced caching mechanisms that can significantly speed up the build process. It supports more efficient layer caching and is capable of parallelizing builds, allowing for faster image creation and reduced rebuild times.
  • Parallel Build Stages
    BuildKit's ability to parallelize the processing of build stages allows for more efficient use of resources, reducing the overall time needed to compile and assemble Docker images.
  • Flexible Syntax
    It supports advanced Dockerfile syntax, such as 'RUN --mount=type=cache', enabling more granular control over build operations, which can help optimize the build process and reduce size and time.
  • Security Improvements
    BuildKit adds security features like rootless builds and build secrets, allowing developers to create safer environments by limiting the need for superuser permissions and securely managing sensitive information during builds.
  • Reduced Build Context
    BuildKit can help minimize the build context sent to the Docker daemon, optimizing network usage and performance by only sending necessary files.

Possible disadvantages of BuildKit

  • Complexity
    For users familiar with the traditional Docker build system, the new features and functionalities of BuildKit, such as the advanced syntax and caching options, may introduce added complexity and a steeper learning curve.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Not all environments and Dockerfile features are fully compatible with BuildKit's advanced capabilities, which might require adjustments or limit its applicability in certain scenarios.
  • Resource Consumption
    Due to its parallel processing capabilities, BuildKit might consume more resources than traditional builds, potentially leading to increased CPU and memory usage.
  • Maturation Level
    As a relatively newer tool, BuildKit may still face occasional bugs and is in an ongoing state of development, which can impact stability and reliability for production environments.

Google Open Source features and specs

  • Community Support
    Google Open Source projects often have large, active communities that contribute to the software's development and provide support.
  • Innovation
    Google frequently publishes cutting-edge projects, allowing developers to utilize the latest in technology and innovation.
  • Quality Documentation
    Google Open Source projects generally come with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to integrate and utilize their tools.
  • Scalability
    Many of Google's open-source projects are designed to scale efficiently, benefiting from Google's extensive experience in handling large-scale systems.
  • Integration with Other Google Services
    Open-source projects from Google often integrate smoothly with other Google services and platforms, providing a cohesive ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of Google Open Source

  • Dependency on Google
    Being tied to Google ecosystems might lead to dependencies, making it harder for developers to switch to other alternatives.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Some developers are wary of data privacy issues when using tools developed by Google, given the company's history with data collection.
  • Complexity
    Google’s projects can sometimes be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with their systems and methodologies.
  • Licensing Issues
    Open-source licensing can sometimes pose challenges, especially for companies trying to ensure compliance with multiple licensing requirements.
  • Longevity and Support
    Not all Google open-source projects have long-term support, and there is a risk that some projects may be abandoned or shelved.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BuildKit and Google Open Source)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
14 14%
86% 86
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0
Open Source
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BuildKit and Google Open Source. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Open Source seems to be a lot more popular than BuildKit. While we know about 24 links to Google Open Source, we've tracked only 1 mention of BuildKit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BuildKit mentions (1)

  • Su issues within a pod
    It does look odd but its valid. It’s dockerfile buildkit secret mount. Https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/build_enhancements/. Source: over 2 years ago

Google Open Source mentions (24)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BuildKit and Google Open Source, you can also consider the following products

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

Code NASA - 253 NASA open source software projects

Crane - Crane is a docker image builder to approach light-weight ML users who want to expand a container image with custom apt/conda/pip packages without writing any Dockerfile.

GitHub Sponsors - Get paid to build what you love on GitHub

Buildah - Buildah is a web-based OCI container tool that allows you to manage the wide range of images in your OCI container and helps you to build the image container from the scratch.

Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.