Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BuildJet for GitHub Actions VS Blacksmith

Compare BuildJet for GitHub Actions VS Blacksmith and see what are their differences

BuildJet for GitHub Actions logo BuildJet for GitHub Actions

We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.

Blacksmith logo Blacksmith

Build your own data platform
  • BuildJet for GitHub Actions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-04
  • Blacksmith Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

BuildJet for GitHub Actions features and specs

  • Cost Efficiency
    BuildJet provides a more cost-effective solution by offering competitive pricing compared to other cloud-based CI/CD services, helping teams reduce their continuous integration and deployment expenses.
  • Faster Builds
    With BuildJet, GitHub Actions users can experience faster build times by utilizing optimized infrastructure, allowing for quicker feedback and iteration cycles.
  • Seamless Integration
    BuildJet integrates smoothly with GitHub Actions, providing an enhanced user experience without requiring significant changes to existing workflows.
  • Scalability
    The platform can easily scale with your project's needs, accommodating both small teams with minimal workloads and larger teams with extensive CI/CD requirements.

Possible disadvantages of BuildJet for GitHub Actions

  • Dependency on Third-party
    Using BuildJet means relying on an external service, which can introduce concerns regarding data privacy, service reliability, and long-term availability.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    As a newer or less widely adopted solution, BuildJet might not offer as extensive a range of features or plugins as other, more established CI/CD platforms.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Users new to BuildJet might face a learning curve as they adapt to the platform's specific functionalities and integration nuances.

Blacksmith features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BuildJet for GitHub Actions and Blacksmith)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Data Privacy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BuildJet for GitHub Actions and Blacksmith. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BuildJet for GitHub Actions seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BuildJet for GitHub Actions mentions (5)

  • Experiment: The costs of slow build times
    Disclaimer: Co-founder of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions While more cores can certainly help with certain types of projects, such as those that can be easily parallelized, this is not always the case. For example, web app projects won't benefit as much from additional cores. Another important factor to consider is the single-core performance of each vCPU. Many server-class CPUs, such as those used by... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Blazing fast CI with MicroVMs
    Congratulations on the launch. It looks pretty much like a self-hosted version of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • CircleCI Announces Support for Gitlab
    I'm a bit biased as one of the founders of BuildJet, but we solve this exact issue. BuildJet for GitHub Actions, plugs elegantly into GitHub Actions. With 1-line change in your config, you get 2x speed for half of GitHub's price. Check it out @ https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub
    With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantly higher per core performance compared to the native runner. Check us out here: https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • GitHub Actions by Example
    Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware (close to the metal). Check out BuildJet for GitHub actions[1] - 2x the speed for half the price. Easy to install and easy to revert. [1] https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Blacksmith mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Blacksmith yet. Tracking of Blacksmith recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BuildJet for GitHub Actions and Blacksmith, you can also consider the following products

RunsOn - Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.

Improvado.io - Improvado is an ETL platform that extracts data from 300+ pre-built connectors, transforms it, and seamlessly loads the results to wherever you need them. No more Tedious Manual Work, Errors or Discrepancies. Contact us for a demo.

Social Post - A simple way to send messages from GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production

CloudFlare - Cloudflare is a global network designed to make everything you connect to the Internet secure, private, fast, and reliable.

Actionsflow - Free Zapier alternative based on Github Actions