Software Alternatives & Reviews

Buildbot VS Go.CD

Compare Buildbot VS Go.CD and see what are their differences

Buildbot logo Buildbot

Python-based continuous integration testing framework

Go.CD logo Go.CD

Open source continuous delivery tool allows for advanced workflow modeling and dependencies management.
  • Buildbot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • Go.CD Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25

Buildbot videos

Craig Rodrigues - Migrating Python.org to Buildbot 9 and Python 3 - SF Python Meetup

Go.CD videos

No Go.CD videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buildbot and Go.CD)
Continuous Integration
62 62%
38% 38
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
DevOps Tools
64 64%
36% 36
Continuous Deployment
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Buildbot and Go.CD. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buildbot seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buildbot mentions (9)

  • 10 open source tools that platform, SRE and DevOps engineers should consider in 2024.
    Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Continuos Integration and C++
    If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 1 year ago
  • What are the open source CI/CD tools for C++ (comparable to Ansible, Jenkins, etc.)?
    If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Why Jenkins?
    Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Which is the best CI/CD self-hosted open source tool?
    I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

Go.CD mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Go.CD yet. Tracking of Go.CD recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buildbot and Go.CD, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

NIM - GB64.COM is the home of The Gamebase Collection of C64 games.

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language

Drone.io - Continuous Integration For GitHub and Bitbucket That Monitors Your code For Bugs