Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bugster.dev VS Cypress.io

Compare Bugster.dev VS Cypress.io and see what are their differences

Bugster.dev logo Bugster.dev

Let AI Test While You Build!

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
  • Bugster.dev
    Image date //
    2025-03-25
  • Bugster.dev
    Image date //
    2025-03-25

Bugster is an AI-powered software testing agent that autonomously captures user flows and converts them into end-to-end (E2E) tests. By learning from real user interactions, Bugster ensures that test cases stay relevant as your application evolves. The agent updates and maintains tests automatically, reducing the need for manual intervention. Developers benefit from detailed logs and insightful reports, enabling faster debugging and ensuring the application works as intended. With Bugster, busy developers can focus on building features while staying confident that their app performs flawlessly.

  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17

Bugster.dev features and specs

  • AI-Powered E2E Test Generation
    Automatically creates and updates tests based on real user interactions, ensuring test cases remain relevant.
  • Autonomous Test Maintenance
    Keeps tests up to date as the application evolves, eliminating manual adjustments and saving developers time.
  • Detailed Logs & Debugging Insights
    Provides comprehensive reports and logs to help developers quickly identify and fix issues, ensuring a stable application.

Cypress.io features and specs

  • Easy Setup and Configuration
    Cypress.io is known for its straightforward setup process, requiring minimal configuration to get started with writing and running tests, making it very accessible for developers new to end-to-end testing.
  • Real-time Reloads
    Cypress offers real-time reloading of tests, which improves the development experience by allowing instant feedback on test results as code changes are made.
  • Time Travel Debugging
    Cypress provides the ability to 'time travel' through tests by taking snapshots of the application state at different steps, making it easier to debug and understand failures.
  • Automatic Waiting
    Tests in Cypress automatically wait for commands and assertions, eliminating the need for manual waits and helping to avoid flaky tests due to timing issues.
  • Built-in Mocking and Stubbing
    Cypress has built-in capabilities for mocking and stubbing network requests, which simplifies testing of applications that depend on various services and APIs.
  • Rich Documentation and Community Support
    Cypress boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Cross Browser Testing
    Cypress supports testing in multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cypress.io

  • Limited Browser Support
    Although Cypress supports several major browsers, it does not support legacy browsers like Internet Explorer, which can be a disadvantage for projects that require testing across a wider range of browsers.
  • No Native Mobile App Testing
    Cypress does not natively support mobile app testing, limiting its use for projects that need end-to-end testing on mobile platforms.
  • Heavy Memory Usage
    Cypress can consume significant system resources, particularly memory, which may impact performance during large or complex test runs.
  • Limited Parallelism
    By default, Cypress's parallel execution capabilities are limited, which can slow down the test suite execution for larger projects, although this can be mitigated with the Dashboard Service (a paid feature).
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic tests are easy to set up, leveraging advanced features like custom commands, plugins, and complex test setups can require a steeper learning curve.
  • Incompatibility with Some Testing Ecosystems
    Cypress's architecture and testing approach can sometimes cause compatibility issues with certain testing frameworks and libraries, particularly those that are tightly coupled with traditional WebDriver-based tools.

Bugster.dev videos

No Bugster.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cypress.io videos

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bugster.dev and Cypress.io)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
3 3%
97% 97
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100
AI
100 100%
0% 0

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Bugster.dev and Cypress.io.

What makes your product unique?

Bugster.dev's answer

Bugster autonomously updates tests based on real user flows, eliminates manual test creation, detects bugs early, and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Bugster.dev's answer

Bugster stands out by offering fully autonomous test maintenance, automatically adapting tests as your application evolves—eliminating the need for constant manual updates. Unlike competitors that rely on static scripts, Bugster generates end-to-end (E2E) tests based on real user interactions, ensuring that test cases reflect actual user behavior. Developers save valuable time by avoiding manual test creation while benefiting from detailed AI-powered logs and reports that accelerate the debugging process. Bugster seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines, enabling continuous testing and ensuring that your application remains stable and reliable. With Bugster, busy developers can focus on delivering features, knowing their application is being thoroughly tested in the background.

User comments

Share your experience with using Bugster.dev and Cypress.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Bugster.dev and Cypress.io

Bugster.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Bugster.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cypress.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bugster.dev mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Bugster.dev yet. Tracking of Bugster.dev recommendations started around Mar 2025.

Cypress.io mentions (27)

  • Ensuring Web Accessibility with Cypress: A Comprehensive Guide
    Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bugster.dev and Cypress.io, you can also consider the following products

Testim - Stable, self-healing, end-to-end test automation via machine learning. Testim helps accelerate the delivery of high-quality software. Speed up test-authoring and improve the stability of automated, end-to-end tests.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

mabl - The #1 AI-Native Test Automation Platform

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.