Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Buffer Editor VS CodeStream

Compare Buffer Editor VS CodeStream and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Buffer Editor logo Buffer Editor

Buffer Editor is a POWERFUL code and text editor that lets you easily develop software, review code...

CodeStream logo CodeStream

CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE
  • Buffer Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-20
  • CodeStream Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-15

CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using your favorite keybindings and environment. Use a simple shortcut to highlight your code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are automatically repositioned as your code changes, even across branches.

Buffer Editor features and specs

  • Multi-language support
    Buffer Editor supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for developers working in different coding environments.
  • Cross-platform availability
    The application is available on multiple platforms including iOS, enabling coding on-the-go for mobile users.
  • Cloud integration
    Buffer Editor integrates with cloud services such as iCloud, Dropbox, and Google Drive, allowing seamless access to projects across devices.
  • Customizable interface
    Users can customize the interface to suit their preferences, enhancing their coding experience.
  • SSH and SFTP support
    The app supports SSH and SFTP connections, making it easy to edit files on remote servers directly from the editor.

Possible disadvantages of Buffer Editor

  • Limited free version
    While Buffer Editor offers a free version, its features are limited, requiring a paid upgrade for full access.
  • Learning curve
    New users might face a learning curve, especially if they are accustomed to different development environments.
  • Mobile interface constraints
    Editing on mobile devices, particularly on smaller screens, can be challenging and less efficient compared to desktops.
  • Performance issues
    Some users have encountered performance issues, such as lag or crashes, especially with large files.
  • Limited advanced features
    Compared to more robust desktop IDEs, Buffer Editor might lack some advanced features needed for larger-scale software development.

CodeStream features and specs

  • Integration with IDEs
    CodeStream integrates seamlessly with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, JetBrains, and others, making it easy for developers to use it within their existing workflow.
  • In-Context Collaboration
    Allows developers to comment and discuss code directly within the IDE, fostering better communication without having to leave the development environment.
  • Code Annotations
    Provides the ability to annotate code, making it easier to give feedback, suggest improvements, and highlight important sections.
  • Integration with Issue Trackers
    Supports integration with popular issue trackers like Jira, Trello, and GitHub Issues, enabling seamless issue management.
  • Code Review Support
    Facilitates code reviews directly within the IDE, simplifying the review process and ensuring that feedback is received and addressed promptly.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    Offers real-time collaboration features, allowing multiple developers to work on the same codebase simultaneously.
  • Ease of Use
    User-friendly interface that makes it easy for both new and experienced developers to adopt and use effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CodeStream

  • Performance Overhead
    The additional features and integration can sometimes lead to performance overhead, potentially making the IDE slower.
  • Learning Curve
    Though user-friendly, some features may still require a learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to in-IDE collaboration tools.
  • Limited to Specific IDEs
    While it integrates with popular IDEs, it does not support all development environments, which may be a limitation for some teams.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services
    Heavily dependent on third-party services like GitHub, Jira, etc., which might cause issues if those services experience downtime or connectivity issues.
  • Subscription Costs
    Depending on the features needed, some functionalities may require a subscription, adding to the overall cost for software development teams.
  • Security Concerns
    Integrating with various external tools and services might raise security concerns, especially for projects with stringent security requirements.

Buffer Editor videos

+ Add

Buffer Editor's Test Suite

CodeStream videos

+ Add

CodeStream Code Review Inside Your IDE

More videos:

  • Review - CodeStream
  • Review - CodeStream introduces in-IDE Code Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buffer Editor and CodeStream)

Buffer Editor

CodeStream

Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Buffer Editor and CodeStream. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Buffer Editor and CodeStream

Buffer Editor Reviews

We have no reviews of Buffer Editor yet.
Be the first one to post

CodeStream Reviews

  1. Guest
    Great Product

    After using this with my development team for a few weeks, we grew to love it. Product works amazing for its purpose and really helps developers communicate about our code.

    👍 Pros:    Well designed|Works perfectly

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buffer Editor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buffer Editor mentions (2)

  • Hacker News top posts: Apr 8, 2022
    Buffereditor – Code and Text Editor for iPhone, iPad and iPad Pro\ (65 comments). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Anyone either code or use embroidery software on an ipad?
    What kind of coding? You might be interested in Buffer, Textastic or Pythonista 3! Source: over 3 years ago

CodeStream mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeStream yet. Tracking of CodeStream recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buffer Editor and CodeStream, you can also consider the following products

Textastic - Textastic is a text, code, and markup editor for iPad and iPhone with support for syntax highlighting, FTP, SFTP, and Dropbox.

Figstack - Your intelligent coding companion

Koder Code Editor - Koder Code comes with Syntax highlighting for PHP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, SQL, JavaScript, Delphi, Visual Basic, Diff, Erlang, Groovy, Powershell, Latex, Scala etc.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Pyto - Coding Python Scripts

GitLive - Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

Loading...