Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Buffalo Go Framework VS AWS Lambda

Compare Buffalo Go Framework VS AWS Lambda and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Buffalo Go Framework logo Buffalo Go Framework

A Go web development eco-system, designed to make your life easier.

AWS Lambda logo AWS Lambda

Automatic, event-driven compute service
  • Buffalo Go Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-03
  • AWS Lambda Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-29

Buffalo Go Framework features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    Buffalo provides a suite of tools that help in speeding up the development process, including hot reloading, a built-in web server, and generators for quickly scaffolding a project.
  • Convention over Configuration
    The framework emphasizes convention over configuration, reducing the need for boilerplate code and allowing developers to focus more on building features rather than setting up the project structure.
  • Full-Stack Capabilities
    Buffalo is designed to provide a complete web development framework, including frontend and backend integration, asset management, and database support, making it a one-stop shop for Go web applications.
  • Community Support
    The framework has an active community that provides support, plugins, and regular updates, which is beneficial for long-term project maintenance and finding quick solutions to common issues.

Possible disadvantages of Buffalo Go Framework

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its unique conventions and combination of features, new users, especially those unfamiliar with full-stack development in Go, may face a learning curve.
  • Less Mature Ecosystem
    Compared to more established frameworks like Ruby on Rails or Django, Buffalo's ecosystem is relatively young, potentially lacking the depth and breadth of plugins, extensions, and community-developed modules.
  • Performance Overhead
    Buffalo’s emphasis on convenience and a full-stack approach may introduce some performance overhead due to additional abstractions compared to using pure Go or more lightweight frameworks.
  • Limited Real-World Use Cases
    Being a newer framework, there may be fewer case studies, success stories, or reference architectures available for Buffalo, which could be a concern for developers looking for proven, large-scale application examples.

AWS Lambda features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS Lambda automatically scales your application by running your code in response to each trigger. This means no manual intervention is required to handle varying levels of traffic.
  • Cost-effectiveness
    You only pay for the compute time you consume. Billing is metered in increments of 100 milliseconds and you are not charged when your code is not running.
  • Reduced Operations Overhead
    AWS Lambda abstracts the infrastructure management layer, so there is no need to manage or provision servers. This allows you to focus more on writing code for your applications.
  • Flexibility
    Supports multiple programming languages such as Python, Node.js, Ruby, Java, Go, and .NET, which allows you to use the language you are most comfortable with.
  • Integration with Other AWS Services
    Seamlessly integrates with many other AWS services such as S3, DynamoDB, RDS, SNS, and more, making it versatile and highly functional.
  • Automatic Scaling and Load Balancing
    Handles thousands of concurrent requests without managing the scaling yourself, making it suitable for applications requiring high availability and reliability.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Lambda

  • Cold Start Latency
    The first request to a Lambda function after it has been idle for a certain period can take longer to execute. This is referred to as a 'cold start' and can impact performance.
  • Resource Limits
    Lambda has defined limits, such as a maximum execution timeout of 15 minutes, memory allocation ranging from 128 MB to 10,240 MB, and temporary storage up to 512 MB.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using AWS Lambda ties you into the AWS ecosystem, making it difficult to migrate to another cloud provider or an on-premises solution without significant modifications to your application.
  • Complexity of Debugging
    Debugging and monitoring distributed, serverless applications can be more complex compared to traditional applications due to the lack of direct access to the underlying infrastructure.
  • Cold Start Issues with VPC
    When Lambda functions are configured to access resources within a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), the cold start latency can be exacerbated due to additional VPC networking overhead.
  • Limited Execution Control
    AWS Lambda is designed for stateless, short-running tasks and may not be suitable for long-running processes or tasks requiring complex orchestration.

Buffalo Go Framework videos

Barstool Pizza Review - La Nova Pizzeria (Buffalo)

More videos:

  • Review - BUFFALO LOW COLBY TRAINERS GREY - SNEAKER REVIEW #4 (SIZING, FIT, MEASUREMENTS)
  • Review - BUFFALO LONDON CLASSICS UNBOXING REVIEW + ON FEET

AWS Lambda videos

AWS Lambda Vs EC2 | Serverless Vs EC2 | EC2 Alternatives

More videos:

  • Tutorial - AWS Lambda Tutorial | AWS Tutorial for Beginners | Intro to AWS Lambda | AWS Training | Edureka
  • Tutorial - AWS Lambda | What is AWS Lambda | AWS Lambda Tutorial for Beginners | Intellipaat

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buffalo Go Framework and AWS Lambda)
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Buffalo Go Framework and AWS Lambda. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Buffalo Go Framework and AWS Lambda

Buffalo Go Framework Reviews

We have no reviews of Buffalo Go Framework yet.
Be the first one to post

AWS Lambda Reviews

Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
AWS Lambda is suitable for applications with varying workloads and those already using the AWS ecosystem.
Source: signoz.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS Lambda seems to be a lot more popular than Buffalo Go Framework. While we know about 274 links to AWS Lambda, we've tracked only 12 mentions of Buffalo Go Framework. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buffalo Go Framework mentions (12)

  • Web-Framework equivalent to Nest.js in golang?
    Maybe https://gobuffalo.io/en/ is the closest one, 🤔. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Golang for backend
    There's nothing like Django for Go, I believe the closest would be Buffalo, typically when building backends in Go you pick and choose a combination of standard library packages and third party packages to build your services. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Enigma Virtual Box – Application Virtualization System for Windows
    These seem to be a way to embed all files to one executeable binary. Similar for Windows is https://github.com/sudachen/Molebox Others: - C/C++ has linker to link all to one binary - CLI/webserver only https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan like https://redbean.dev . Same exe works on many x64 OS like Windows/macOS/Linux/BSD, it embeds .zip file and can read/write to embedded .zip on the fly. - AppImage... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • why do big projects like docker, hugo, terraform, traefik, cockroachdb, influxdb etc used golang despite all these gotchas and caveats?
    If you want to build a website with Go, first of you don't need nginx or caddy. Go's standard library web server is fantastic. One thing I find with Go is that because it's powerful enough to build a great web server, memory cache, or database, you can solve problems at a lower level. This is something I personally find really fun. If you want a full-on web formwork experience checkout https://gobuffalo.io/en/.... Source: over 3 years ago
  • A Love Letter to Ruby and Rails
    It's early days but so far I've quite enjoyed my experience with Buffalo (Golang) framework [1], which mostly copies from Rails. Get Go performance and static typing. Definitely some rough patches, but overall still quite an enjoyable experience (so far). [1] https://gobuffalo.io/en/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

AWS Lambda mentions (274)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buffalo Go Framework and AWS Lambda, you can also consider the following products

Gin Gonic - Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin. - ...

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Beego - Beego Web is official blog and documentation website for beego app web framework

Google App Engine - A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Blogo - The easiest & fastest way to write, publish & manage blogs

Amazon API Gateway - Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale