Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Amazon API Gateway VS Buffalo Go Framework

Compare Amazon API Gateway VS Buffalo Go Framework and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Amazon API Gateway logo Amazon API Gateway

Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale

Buffalo Go Framework logo Buffalo Go Framework

A Go web development eco-system, designed to make your life easier.
  • Amazon API Gateway Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Buffalo Go Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-03

Amazon API Gateway features and specs

  • Scalability
    API Gateway automatically scales to handle the number of requests your API receives, ensuring high availability and reliability.
  • Ease of Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like Lambda, DynamoDB, and IAM, enabling a cohesive environment for developing serverless applications.
  • Built-in Security
    Provides features such as IAM roles, API keys, and AWS WAF integration for safeguarding your APIs from potential threats.
  • Monitoring and Logging
    Supports CloudWatch integration for monitoring API requests and responses, helping you maintain observability and troubleshoot issues effectively.
  • Cost-Effective
    You only pay for the requests made to your APIs and the amount of data transferred out, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
  • Caching
    Built-in caching at the API Gateway level can improve performance and reduce latency for frequently accessed data.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon API Gateway

  • Complexity in Configuration
    Setting up and managing API Gateway can be complex, especially for users who are not familiar with AWS services and cloud infrastructure.
  • Cold Start Latency
    When integrated with AWS Lambda, cold starts can introduce latency which can affect the performance of your API.
  • Cost for High Throughput
    While cost-effective for low to moderate usage, the costs can escalate with high throughput and large data transfers.
  • Debugging Issues
    Diagnosis can be complicated due to the multi-tenant nature of the service and the need to dive into multiple AWS logs and services.
  • Limited Customization
    There might be constraints regarding customizations and fine-tuning your APIs compared to self-hosting solutions.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Dependence on AWS infrastructure can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to other cloud providers or solutions.

Buffalo Go Framework features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    Buffalo provides a suite of tools that help in speeding up the development process, including hot reloading, a built-in web server, and generators for quickly scaffolding a project.
  • Convention over Configuration
    The framework emphasizes convention over configuration, reducing the need for boilerplate code and allowing developers to focus more on building features rather than setting up the project structure.
  • Full-Stack Capabilities
    Buffalo is designed to provide a complete web development framework, including frontend and backend integration, asset management, and database support, making it a one-stop shop for Go web applications.
  • Community Support
    The framework has an active community that provides support, plugins, and regular updates, which is beneficial for long-term project maintenance and finding quick solutions to common issues.

Possible disadvantages of Buffalo Go Framework

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its unique conventions and combination of features, new users, especially those unfamiliar with full-stack development in Go, may face a learning curve.
  • Less Mature Ecosystem
    Compared to more established frameworks like Ruby on Rails or Django, Buffalo's ecosystem is relatively young, potentially lacking the depth and breadth of plugins, extensions, and community-developed modules.
  • Performance Overhead
    Buffalo’s emphasis on convenience and a full-stack approach may introduce some performance overhead due to additional abstractions compared to using pure Go or more lightweight frameworks.
  • Limited Real-World Use Cases
    Being a newer framework, there may be fewer case studies, success stories, or reference architectures available for Buffalo, which could be a concern for developers looking for proven, large-scale application examples.

Amazon API Gateway videos

Building APIs with Amazon API Gateway

More videos:

  • Review - Create API using AWS API Gateway service - Amazon API Gateway p1

Buffalo Go Framework videos

Barstool Pizza Review - La Nova Pizzeria (Buffalo)

More videos:

  • Review - BUFFALO LOW COLBY TRAINERS GREY - SNEAKER REVIEW #4 (SIZING, FIT, MEASUREMENTS)
  • Review - BUFFALO LONDON CLASSICS UNBOXING REVIEW + ON FEET

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon API Gateway and Buffalo Go Framework)
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
100% 100
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon API Gateway and Buffalo Go Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon API Gateway should be more popular than Buffalo Go Framework. It has been mentiond 107 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon API Gateway mentions (107)

  • 10 Lightweight API Gateways for Your Next Project
    AWS API Gateway is Amazon’s managed gateway service, designed to work seamlessly within the AWS ecosystem. It supports both REST and WebSocket APIs, with HTTP APIs being the lightweight, lower-cost option for simple proxying and routing use cases. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • 4 Cognito User Pools features you might not know about
    This opens up a world of customization options for controlling app access. For example, we can embed custom data in the ID token for the front-end client to use, enabling guards to restrict content. Alternatively, we can add custom scopes to the access token and implement fine-grained access control in an API Gateway API. All it takes is some Lambda function code, and Cognito triggers it at the right time. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Verifying Cognito access tokens - Comparing three JWT packages for Lambda authorizers
    When the built-in Amazon API Gateway authorization methods don’t fully meet our needs, we can set up Lambda authorizers to manage the access control process. Even when using Cognito user pools and Cognito access tokens, there may still be a need for custom authorization logic. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Implementing advanced authorization with AWS Lambda for endpoint-specific access
    The API Gateway includes an endpoint structured like this:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Turning APIs into Revenue: Passive Income Strategies for Developers
    Amazon Web Services exemplifies this approach with automatic volume discounts that encourage increased usage while maximizing revenue at each consumption level. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

Buffalo Go Framework mentions (12)

  • Web-Framework equivalent to Nest.js in golang?
    Maybe https://gobuffalo.io/en/ is the closest one, 🤔. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Golang for backend
    There's nothing like Django for Go, I believe the closest would be Buffalo, typically when building backends in Go you pick and choose a combination of standard library packages and third party packages to build your services. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Enigma Virtual Box – Application Virtualization System for Windows
    These seem to be a way to embed all files to one executeable binary. Similar for Windows is https://github.com/sudachen/Molebox Others: - C/C++ has linker to link all to one binary - CLI/webserver only https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan like https://redbean.dev . Same exe works on many x64 OS like Windows/macOS/Linux/BSD, it embeds .zip file and can read/write to embedded .zip on the fly. - AppImage... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • why do big projects like docker, hugo, terraform, traefik, cockroachdb, influxdb etc used golang despite all these gotchas and caveats?
    If you want to build a website with Go, first of you don't need nginx or caddy. Go's standard library web server is fantastic. One thing I find with Go is that because it's powerful enough to build a great web server, memory cache, or database, you can solve problems at a lower level. This is something I personally find really fun. If you want a full-on web formwork experience checkout https://gobuffalo.io/en/.... Source: over 3 years ago
  • A Love Letter to Ruby and Rails
    It's early days but so far I've quite enjoyed my experience with Buffalo (Golang) framework [1], which mostly copies from Rails. Get Go performance and static typing. Definitely some rough patches, but overall still quite an enjoyable experience (so far). [1] https://gobuffalo.io/en/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon API Gateway and Buffalo Go Framework, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Gin Gonic - Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin. - ...

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Beego - Beego Web is official blog and documentation website for beego app web framework

Apigee - Intelligent and complete API platform

Blogo - The easiest & fastest way to write, publish & manage blogs