Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

buddybuild VS userinput.io

Compare buddybuild VS userinput.io and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

buddybuild logo buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless system. With buddybuild, you can focus on what matters most: creating awesome apps.

userinput.io logo userinput.io

Get on-demand feedback for your app, website or idea. Learn how to improve by hearing real opinions.
  • buddybuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05
  • userinput.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-04

buddybuild features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Buddybuild provides an intuitive interface that simplifies the process of setting up continuous integration and continuous deployment pipelines, making it accessible for developers without extensive DevOps expertise.
  • Integration with Git Services
    It seamlessly integrates with popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing for easy connection and automation of build processes based on code changes.
  • Automated Testing
    Buddybuild offers automated testing features, which help in ensuring code quality by running pre-defined tests on every build, providing quick feedback for developers.
  • Real-time Feedback
    Developers receive immediate notifications and insights about build statuses and issues, allowing for faster resolutions and continuous improvement.
  • App Distribution
    Buddybuild assists in distributing apps to testers directly, streamlining the beta testing process by simplifying the deployment of testing builds.

Possible disadvantages of buddybuild

  • Price
    Buddybuild can be expensive for smaller teams or individual developers, as its pricing may scale with the number of users and features required.
  • Limited Platform Support
    Historically, Buddybuild was noted for lacking support beyond iOS projects after its acquisition by Apple, which could limit its utility for teams working on multi-platform applications.
  • Dependency on Cloud Service
    As a cloud-based service, its functionality is dependent on internet access and operational cloud servers, which might not be ideal for all development environments.
  • Customization Limitations
    While offering ease of use, Buddybuild may not provide the level of customization and control over the CI/CD process that more advanced setups might require.
  • Transitions and Changes
    Post-acquisition developments have led to changes in service offerings and support, which have at times resulted in uncertainty for existing users regarding long-term support and features.

userinput.io features and specs

  • Affordable Pricing
    userinput.io offers a cost-effective way to gather user feedback, making it accessible for small businesses and startups.
  • Real-User Feedback
    Provides genuine insights from actual users, which can help in understanding the user experience more accurately.
  • Quick Turnaround
    Delivers feedback in a timely manner, which is crucial for rapid iteration and development.
  • Video Recordings
    Offers video feedback from users, providing a clear visual and auditory context for their comments and opinions.
  • Customization Options
    Allows customization of questions and tasks, enabling you to gather specific information that is relevant to your project.

Possible disadvantages of userinput.io

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Might lack some advanced features that more comprehensive user testing platforms offer, such as in-depth analytics or heatmaps.
  • Dependent on User Pool
    The quality and relevance of feedback can vary depending on the specific users selected for the task.
  • Not Suitable for Large-Scale Testing
    Might not be ideal for large-scale user testing or highly complex projects that require extensive analysis.
  • Potential Bias
    Feedback can be influenced by the subjective opinions of a limited user group, which may not represent the broader target audience.
  • No In-Person Interaction
    Lacks the ability to interact with users in real-time, which can be beneficial for probing deeper into specific issues.

buddybuild videos

Spotlight: BuddyBuild

userinput.io videos

No userinput.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to buddybuild and userinput.io)
Customer Feedback
63 63%
37% 37
User Experience
0 0%
100% 100
Forms And Surveys
100 100%
0% 0
Usability
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using buddybuild and userinput.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing buddybuild and userinput.io, you can also consider the following products

Asklayer - Get real answers from your customers with Asklayers surveys, quizzes, polls and more. Works on any website with zero code and includes enterprise level features such auto-segmentation, user tagging, branching, NPS & CSAT calculation.

Instabug - The top apps in the world rely on Instabug for beta testing, user engagement and crash reporting.

Ask User - User surveys without stress

UserTest.io - User testing made simple. High-quality, affordable user testing solutions from real users, here in the UK. Improve your usability!

Doorbell.io - Collect in-app user feedback. Available on websites, iOS, and Android.

UserTesting.com - Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!