Bubblewrap VS GitHub Sponsors

As an example we will look at man 1 bwrap. Bubblewrap allows us to sandbox an application, not too dissimilar to docker. Flatpaks use bubblewrap as part of their sandbox. Bubblewrap can optionally take in a list of syscalls to filter. The filter is expressed as a BPF(Berkley Packet Filter program - remember when I said docker gives you a friendlier interface to seccomp?) program. Below is a short program... - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago

I have already been using bubblewrap[1] to isolate KeePassXC from the network and more (the only access it has is to its own private directory and the Wayland socket). I wouldn't recommend relying on devs or maintainers to do application isolation work for you. [1] <https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap>. - Source: Hacker News / 12 days ago

Recently, I came across Chainguard and wrote the article How to build Docker Images with Melange and Apko. As a fervent supporter of Kubernetes and GitLab CI, I was eager to experiment with building images using Melange in this particular setup. GitLab's shared Runners work seamlessly with Bubblewrap, eliminating the need for additional configurations. This post is intended for enthusiasts like myself, interested... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

``` This is basically manually invoking what Flatpak does: https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap This is also useful for more than just security. E.G., you can test how your app would behave on a fresh install by masking your user configuration files. I personally also have a tool that uses it to basically bundle all dependencies from an entire Linux... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

To, say, override the KDE plugins while testing. This is useful for me since it's rather challenging during development to actually get KDE apps to reliably load my plugins on NixOS: I think kio slaves are probably wrapped and getting other environments injected into them. Rather than bother with any tricky hacks, Linux namespaces make it relatively easy to test regardless. Bubblewrap is used internally by Flatpak... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Another great way to contribute to the open-source community is by sponsoring projects that your company uses. GitHub Sponsors makes it easy for you to financially support projects or even contributors in a very public way. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago

GitHub Sponsors was launched five years ago. For several years it was available only in a limited number of countries, but two years ago I could also join. I got a few sponsors, but nothing substantial came out of it. Now I'd like to invest some time an energy understanding it and trying to figure out how could I increase the monthly sponsorship I receive. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

> Sustainability and Monetization: How can open-source projects develop sustainable business models without compromising their core principles? GitHub has its Sponsors program[0]. You can still contribute code safe in the knowledge that you can bring home the bacon if you've managed to get people to sponsor you. [0] https://github.com/sponsors > Dependency and Corporate... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

A few alternatives for micro donations that people have mentioned: https://ko-fi.com/ https://github.com/sponsors https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ Any others, let me know. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

There have been steps forward in the direction of making donation easier: https://github.com/sponsors , which can serve as a "fiscal host." The advantage here is that the default rule at law for how a group of developers working together will be treated is partnership, which means joint and several liability. Working with a fiscal host partitions individual liability from group liability. But there are still open... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago