Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserStack VS Tape

Compare BrowserStack VS Tape and see what are their differences

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Tape logo Tape

Easy, collaborative social video app
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

  • Tape Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-01

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

Tape

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Tape features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Tape provides a minimal and straightforward API that makes it easy to write and read tests without a lot of boilerplate.
  • No Globals
    Tape does not introduce any global variables into the test environment, which helps avoid potential conflicts and promotes a cleaner test setup.
  • Node.js Compatibility
    As a testing tool primarily designed for Node.js, Tape integrates seamlessly without requiring complex setup or configuration.
  • Stream Output
    Tape outputs results in a stream, allowing easy integration with various reporting tools and custom processing.
  • Flexible Use
    Tape allows custom test case organization and can be easily combined with other testing utilities as needed.

Possible disadvantages of Tape

  • Limited Features
    Tape lacks some advanced testing features such as spies, mocks, and code coverage out of the box, necessitating additional libraries.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Complex Testing
    For users familiar with feature-rich frameworks like Mocha or Jest, transitioning to Tape's minimalistic approach may require more effort for complex test setups.
  • Less Community Support
    Tape has a smaller community compared to larger test frameworks like Jest, which means fewer third-party plugins and support resources.
  • Limited Documentation
    While Tape's documentation covers basic concepts, it may not be comprehensive enough for developers requiring in-depth guidance or usage patterns.

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Tape videos

Which Duct Tape Brand is the Best? Let's find out!

More videos:

  • Review - Alien Tape Review: Does This As Seen on TV Tape Work?
  • Review - Nano Tape Review: Put to the Test!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserStack and Tape)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
90 90%
10% 10
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserStack and Tape. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserStack and Tape

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Tape Reviews

We have no reviews of Tape yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Tape might be a bit more popular than BrowserStack. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 7 links to BrowserStack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

Tape mentions (10)

  • Express API Testing
    Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Straight talk: Salary discussion thread
    OK will do. Do you have any tips on finding a suitable project? Ideally I was hoping to to contribute to a piece of software that I actually use/know/like/want to improve. Given that, and my area of expertise, I had shortlisted Signal Desktop, and Tape. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Find component by display name when the component is stateless functional, with Enzyme
    Reactjs I have the following components: // Hello.jsexport default (React) => ({name}) => { return ( Hello {name ? Name : 'Stranger'}! )}// App.jsimport createHello from './Hello'export default (React) => () => { const Hello = createHello(React) const helloProps = { name: 'Jane' } return ( )}// index.jsimport React from 'react'import { render } from 'react-dom'import createApp from... Source: about 3 years ago
  • Tools for testing Functional Web Apps
    For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. Tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Chaijs.com just let their domain expire
    I really enjoy Ava [1] or anything assert-tape-like [2]. "uvu" [3] is getting a lot of love lately, but it's very feature limited and much of it's touted advantages are at the detriment to feature set. [1] https://github.com/avajs/ava [2] https://github.com/substack/tape [3] https://github.com/lukeed/uvu Jest is great for front-end (or full stack integration) testing, but I feel it's specialized for that use-case... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserStack and Tape, you can also consider the following products

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript