Software Alternatives & Reviews

BrowserStack VS QF-Test

Compare BrowserStack VS QF-Test and see what are their differences

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

QF-Test logo QF-Test

The Tool for professional UI Test Automation - Automate your Web, Java, Windows and Android tests with QF-Test, the professional & reliable testing tool!
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-05

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

  • QF-Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-17

QF-Test is the established tool for professional GUI test automation of desktop, web, mobile applications as well as PDF documents. On the market since 2001, the test tool is continuously being actively developed and is currently used by more than 1,500 companies across 60 countries.

QF-Test is a low-code GUI test tool that allows you to efficiently create test cases, e.g. using Capture/Replay, without any programming knowledge across platforms on Windows, Linux and macOS. For software developers, Jython, Groovy or JavaScript offer advanced scripting possibilities.

Tests can be run automatically via continuous integration tools such as Jenkins and generate detailed log files and XML or HTML reports.

Use QF-Test to create robust and stable regression tests for various GUI technologies.

QF-Test supports all types of Java GUIs, ranging from Swing (including ULC, JIDE components, CaptainCasa), its successor JavaFX, as well as the Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) and Eclipse, including plugins and RCP applications.

You can also use QF-Test to test dynamic web applications based on Angular, React or Vue.js, for example, including Electron and hybrid applications using JxBrowser, JPro or WebSwing, for example.

Learn more at www.qfs.de. Contact us at service@qfs.de and we will help you find the right place for QF-Test in your organization!

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September

QF-Test

Website
qfs.de
$ Details
paid Free Trial €2375.0 / One-off (One-time License purchase | Annual Maintenance + Support fee)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Java Jython Groovy JavaScript Cross Platform Browser Google Chrome Safari Internet Explorer Firefox Edge Opera .Net C++ C
Release Date
2001 December

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based: Yes
  • Browser Extensions: Yes
  • SaaS: Yes

QF-Test features and specs

  • Continuous Integration: e.g. Jenkins, GitLab/CD, Bamboo, Travis CI, Circle CI, TeamCity, Ant, Maven, CruiseControl
  • Testing management: e.g. ALM/QualityCenter by MicroFocus/HP, TestBench by Imbus, QMetry, Klaros by Verit, TestLink, IBM Rational Quality Manager
  • Keyword driven Testing: Yes
  • Data driven Testing: e.g. with Excel, CSV and all kind of data bases
  • Error tracking: e.g. Jira, Mantis, Bugzilla
  • Scripting Language: Jython, Groovy, JavaScript
  • Browser: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Safari, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer
  • Jira Integration: e.g. JIRA and JIRA PlugIns like TestRail, Zephyr, X-Ray, TM4J
  • Java in the browser: Webswing, JPro
  • Daemon mode: Yes
  • Object Recognition: Yes, stable and robust
  • Virtual Desktop Streaming: e.g. Citrix, VMware, VirtualBox
  • Docker: Yes
  • Version Control: e.g. Git, SVN/Subversion, CVS, Mercurial

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

QF-Test videos

Overview

More videos:

  • Demo - Quick Run-Through - Test Automation Features
  • Demo - Version 5.3 - CDP-Driver and New Icons
  • Demo - Technical insights
  • Review - Selenium vs. QF-Test | GUI Test Tool for Java, Web and Windows
  • Review - Testing PDF Documents with QF-Test | GUI Test Tool for Java, Web and Windows
  • Demo - QF-Test Version 5.0 - Testing Windows applications
  • Demo - QF-Test Version 5.1 - embedded browsers

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserStack and QF-Test)
Website Testing
94 94%
6% 6
Automated Testing
91 91%
9% 9
Browser Testing
93 93%
7% 7
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserStack and QF-Test. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserStack and QF-Test

BrowserStack Reviews

Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

QF-Test Reviews

We have no reviews of QF-Test yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserStack mentions (6)

  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Is it possible to remotely control a cell phone using node?
    In all reality your best bet is probably something like browserstack. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Front-End web development on Linux challenges when displaying on Windows / Mac
    There's no convenient solution. You may find using browserstack.com is a little easier than maintaining Windows and macOS systems locally. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

QF-Test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QF-Test yet. Tracking of QF-Test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserStack and QF-Test, you can also consider the following products

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

Ranorex Studio - Accelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, the all-in-one tool for test automation. For desktop, web, or mobile app testing, with easy codeless automation tools, a full IDE, robust object recognition, flexible reporting and built-in Selenium WebDriver.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.