No BrowserLeaks.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, BrowserLeaks.com should be more popular than NoScript. It has been mentiond 113 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This project tests how the browser language can be changed with Puppeteer. It implements multiple options to set the language of Chrome and checks each option against BrowserLeaks to see how it affected the JavaScript proeprties and HTTP headers available by the browser. For more information, see my article The Puppeteer Language Experiment on DEV.to. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
I'm sure that happens, but I haven't done any work with gyro data myself. There's similar logic for mouse cursor movements, there are libraries out there that will generate a natural looking curve that moves the cursor from one position to another, with imperfections that emulate human hand movement. > Why do we even need an actual device? We can emulate if we even need to and set our headers to look like we're... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
WebRTC Leak Test by BrowserLeaks. With WebRTC turned off, as it is by default in Cromite and CalyxOS Chromium, this site returns "No Leak". With Chrome, or with WebRTC turned on (possible via the site settings, which has an address bar shortcut), more information is exposed. Source: 6 months ago
-- *Facebook is intrusive. You may need to make some adjustments to your browser settings and add some privacy extensions to stop browser fingerprinting and leaks. Source: 6 months ago
:set content.proxy socks://127.0.0.1:1055 doesn't work in Qutebrowser for me, and I can't figure out why. What's even more baffling, to me, is that https://browserleaks.com does work, but no other website would work. Source: 10 months ago
Https://noscript.net/ The extension that turns off all JavaScript & Media links on the page. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
You should check out https://noscript.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Good or bad depends on the intentions of the website you're visiting, and unfortunately also of the many 3rd party script sources it includes. Users should have a chance to decide which sites they trust to run JavaScript and which they do not, and this is the reason why 18 years ago I've created NoScript, and why it is still there and shipped by default inside the Tor Browser. Source: 6 months ago
Use a different name, password, and email if you can. Keep an adblocker and noscript handy. Don't accept cookies from new sites. Maybe even use the TOR browser for better anonymity and safety while you're giving these new platforms a test run. Source: about 1 year ago
I do (with the NoScript browser extension: https://noscript.net/). The main reason is to reduce my attack surface. A secondary benefit is it eliminates most ads and other annoying distractions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Cover Your Tracks - Cover Your Tracks is a website that comes with an agile approach for the users to test the privacy of add-ons with best-in-class tools and techniques with complete online support.
uBlock Origin - Popular and efficient blocker for Chromium, Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Opera, Safari, Thunderbird.
privacytools.io - You are being watched.
Ghostery - Privacy tool for transparency and control
DNS leak test - Test your connection for DNS leaks.
Privacy Badger - Privacy Badger blocks spying ads and invisible trackers. How is Privacy Badger different from Disconnect, Adblock Plus, Ghostery, and other blocking extensions?