No features have been listed yet.
No BrowserCloud.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Our company has been working with BrowserCloud.io for ~1 year, we use their API to run 150-200 parallel Puppeteer sessions for our web crawling solution. The skillful support team that can offer customizations for our specific needs
Based on our record, jsdom should be more popular than BrowserCloud.io. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Try to run puppeteer or playwright for these purposes. It depends on how many pages you need to get If you need to scale your web-scraping - you can try https://browsercloud.io. Source: over 2 years ago
Hello How much will you pay AWS for running 10-20 browsers in parallel for a long time? I'm just asking because we're building the https://browsercloud.io service as an alternative. It should be much cheaper than running chromium on AWS/lambda. Really interesting to compare. Source: over 2 years ago
Https://browsercloud.io ;) More info is needed, what site? LinkedIn? How many requests to the site? It might be you need proxy / user-agent rotation and so on. Source: over 2 years ago
Hi Do you have a permanent workload for scraping? We're developing our service for these cases like yours :) It's like "puppeteer cloud", optimized AMD servers that run chromium browsers, you can run 10-20-50 parallel sessions. We have a "usage-based" plan billed per second and it might be cheaper than running your own machine (50-100$/mo?) if you have high workloads from time to time. Take a look:... Source: over 3 years ago
They have rest JSON API for sending and a common SMTP gateway, we use it https://browsercloud.io , works fine. Source: over 3 years ago
Nah, I took a third path - looking for alternatives to JSDOM... And I found it - happy-dom. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
We do have pseudo-browsers written in pure js that you can theoretically use: https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom but they're about as reliable as you can expect: it's difficult to keep up the pace with the big three (or two) on standards compliance, and they usually don't even try. So the only reliable solution is a headless Chromium, Firefox, and/or WebKit-based noname browser like the sibling says.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Internally the test starts an HTTP server. Because the this runs in the test process, mocking and stubbing of business logic is possible. The test use jsdom to communicate with the HTTP server; which both parse the HTML response into a DOM, but also executes client-side script in a sandbox which has been initialised, e.g. With window as the global scope.3. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
For example, I needed to parse an HTML string into a DOM Document. The browser already supports the DOMParser class, which is, unfortunately, not available in Node.js. Here, I have to fall back on JSDOM, which also exposes this class. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
If you happen to be using React Testing Library in your project, you'll need to keep the jsdom dev dependency installed. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.
html2canvas - JavaScript library to take "screenshots" of webpages or parts of it, directly on the...
Geo-Peek.com - This website provides screenshots from 25 geographical locations 12 worldover, 12 USA and 5 in europe.
Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...