Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserCloud.io VS jsdom

Compare BrowserCloud.io VS jsdom and see what are their differences

BrowserCloud.io logo BrowserCloud.io

Headless Browser Automation in the Cloud

jsdom logo jsdom

A JavaScript implementation of various web standards, for use with Node.js - jsdom/jsdom
  • BrowserCloud.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-19
  • jsdom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

BrowserCloud.io features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

jsdom features and specs

  • Browser-like Environment
    jsdom provides a virtual representation of the browser's DOM environment, which allows developers to run scripts that usually require a browser.
  • Node.js Integration
    Being a Node.js library, jsdom can be easily integrated into server-side applications, enabling server-side DOM manipulation.
  • Testing Facilitation
    jsdom is commonly used in testing frameworks to simulate browser environments, allowing for headless testing of front-end code.
  • Standard-compliant
    jsdom strives to be compliant with web standards, which ensures consistent behavior with real browser environments.
  • Rich API
    It provides a rich set of APIs that mimic the browser DOM, making it comprehensive for developers needing browser-like functionality.

Possible disadvantages of jsdom

  • Performance Overhead
    jsdom can be slower than real browser environments because it runs in Node.js and not in a optimized browser engine.
  • Limited Browser Features
    While jsdom supports many DOM features, it might not support all the modern APIs and features available in the latest browsers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple jsdom instances can be resource-intensive, which may not be ideal for applications with large-scale DOM manipulation.
  • JavaScript Only
    Being specific to JavaScript and Node.js, jsdom is not suitable for developers working primarily in other programming environments.
  • Complexity in Setup
    Setting up and configuring jsdom for specific use cases can be more complex compared to some alternatives, requiring more effort from the developer.

BrowserCloud.io videos

No BrowserCloud.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

jsdom videos

JSDom & Enzyme: Different Test Styles for React Apps - Dan La Feir @ ReactNYC

More videos:

  • Review - Frontend Pairing - Discovering missing JSDOM APIs that didn’t allow to test Toast UI in jest

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserCloud.io and jsdom)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
16 16%
84% 84
Headless Browsers
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
19 19%
81% 81

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserCloud.io and jsdom. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserCloud.io and jsdom

BrowserCloud.io Reviews

  1. David
    · CTO at Tatum ·
    Best headless browser provider

    Our company has been working with BrowserCloud.io for ~1 year, we use their API to run 150-200 parallel Puppeteer sessions for our web crawling solution. The skillful support team that can offer customizations for our specific needs

    🏁 Competitors: Browserless
    👍 Pros:    Affordable prices|Excellent technical support.|Stability|Highly customizable

jsdom Reviews

We have no reviews of jsdom yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jsdom should be more popular than BrowserCloud.io. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserCloud.io mentions (7)

  • Best tool for scraping this site
    Try to run puppeteer or playwright for these purposes. It depends on how many pages you need to get If you need to scale your web-scraping - you can try https://browsercloud.io. Source: over 2 years ago
  • I made an AWS CDK stack for taking website screenshots (powered by Puppeteer)
    Hello How much will you pay AWS for running 10-20 browsers in parallel for a long time? I'm just asking because we're building the https://browsercloud.io service as an alternative. It should be much cheaper than running chromium on AWS/lambda. Really interesting to compare. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Need api to get any company public profile
    Https://browsercloud.io ;) More info is needed, what site? LinkedIn? How many requests to the site? It might be you need proxy / user-agent rotation and so on. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Minimum specs for dedicated puppeteer server?
    Hi Do you have a permanent workload for scraping? We're developing our service for these cases like yours :) It's like "puppeteer cloud", optimized AMD servers that run chromium browsers, you can run 10-20-50 parallel sessions. We have a "usage-based" plan billed per second and it might be cheaper than running your own machine (50-100$/mo?) if you have high workloads from time to time. Take a look:... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Best Email API Provider
    They have rest JSON API for sending and a common SMTP gateway, we use it https://browsercloud.io , works fine. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

jsdom mentions (32)

  • Proton: Pluggable SSR + DOM | Or How I implemented better SSR from scratch
    Nah, I took a third path - looking for alternatives to JSDOM... And I found it - happy-dom. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • The Future of Htmx
    We do have pseudo-browsers written in pure js that you can theoretically use: https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom but they're about as reliable as you can expect: it's difficult to keep up the pace with the big three (or two) on standards compliance, and they usually don't even try. So the only reliable solution is a headless Chromium, Firefox, and/or WebKit-based noname browser like the sibling says.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Go-DOM - A headless browser written in Go.
    Internally the test starts an HTTP server. Because the this runs in the test process, mocking and stubbing of business logic is possible. The test use jsdom to communicate with the HTTP server; which both parse the HTML response into a DOM, but also executes client-side script in a sandbox which has been initialised, e.g. With window as the global scope.3. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Excluding Dependencies: Bundling for Node and the Browser
    For example, I needed to parse an HTML string into a DOM Document. The browser already supports the DOMParser class, which is, unfortunately, not available in Node.js. Here, I have to fall back on JSDOM, which also exposes this class. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
    If you happen to be using React Testing Library in your project, you'll need to keep the jsdom dev dependency installed. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserCloud.io and jsdom, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

html2canvas - JavaScript library to take "screenshots" of webpages or parts of it, directly on the...

Geo-Peek.com - This website provides screenshots from 25 geographical locations 12 worldover, 12 USA and 5 in europe.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...