Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Brick FTP VS Azure Storage

Compare Brick FTP VS Azure Storage and see what are their differences

Fileport
The fastest way to send files over the internet featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Brick FTP logo Brick FTP

Enterprise-ready file server solution

Azure Storage logo Azure Storage

Reliable, economical cloud storage for data big and small in the Microsoft Azure cloud
  • Brick FTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-20
  • Azure Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-01

Brick FTP videos

No Brick FTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Azure Storage videos

+ Add

Azure Storage Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Azure Storage Tutorial | Introduction to Blob, Queue, Table & File Share
  • Review - Azure AZ-104 Exam Prep M3 Azure Storage Review Questions

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Brick FTP and Azure Storage)

Brick FTP

Azure Storage

Cloud Storage
51 51%
Cloud Storage
49% 49
File Sharing
100 100%
File Sharing
0% 0
Storage
0 0%
Storage
100% 100
Cloud Computing
68 68%
Cloud Computing
32% 32

User comments

Share your experience with using Brick FTP and Azure Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Storage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Brick FTP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Brick FTP yet. Tracking of Brick FTP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Storage mentions (2)

  • The best hosting options for your static site (for 2023)
    Microsoft Azure Storage is another option for hosting a static website, with a range of pricing plans to suit different needs. It offers features like custom domains and SSL certificates, and it's highly scalable and reliable. Also Azure Storage can be more expensive than some other options, especially for high-traffic websites. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Need help planning photo storage
    I'd start here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/ and mainly look at either FILE (for ease of use, though probably not great if you want to host the share to your community), or BLOB - if you're semi-comfortable with cloud computing and might want to setup a static website or something hosting this content. The next big question is tier - if only a few people are ever going to look at this stuff... Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Brick FTP and Azure Storage, you can also consider the following products

ExaVault - ExaVault is your Secure Cloud FTP platform -- trusted by over 5,000 companies from Adobe to Zillow. Instant setup for manual and automated transfers with a full web interface and direct FTP, FTPS and SFTP support.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Couchdrop - Couchdrop moves files to the cloud. The Cloud SFTP, FTP, SCP and Rsync server that works with Storage like Dropbox. Up and running in seconds. Fully hosted service. No worries.

Amazon EBS - Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) provides persistent block level storage volumes for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Learn more here.

SmartFile - Secure file sharing & FTP hosting for the ​enterprise.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Loading...