Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Brick FTP VS Azure File Storage

Compare Brick FTP VS Azure File Storage and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Brick FTP logo Brick FTP

Enterprise-ready file server solution

Azure File Storage logo Azure File Storage

Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.
  • Brick FTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-20
  • Azure File Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Brick FTP and Azure File Storage)

Brick FTP

Azure File Storage

Cloud Storage
23 23%
Cloud Storage
77% 77
File Sharing
100 100%
File Sharing
0% 0
Work Collaboration
0 0%
Work Collaboration
100% 100
Cloud Computing
75 75%
Cloud Computing
25% 25

User comments

Share your experience with using Brick FTP and Azure File Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure File Storage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Brick FTP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Brick FTP yet. Tracking of Brick FTP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure File Storage mentions (13)

  • Searching for online alternative for a synology
    Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: 11 months ago
  • How To Upload and Delete files in Azure Blob Storage Using Blazor Apps With .NET 7
    ​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Hosted, mappable storage?
    If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Microsoft cloud drive options
    I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Sharing a folder between organizations shows in the file browser?
    I agree with the SharePoint, though another option would be Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Brick FTP and Azure File Storage, you can also consider the following products

ExaVault - ExaVault is your Secure Cloud FTP platform -- trusted by over 5,000 companies from Adobe to Zillow. Instant setup for manual and automated transfers with a full web interface and direct FTP, FTPS and SFTP support.

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage

Couchdrop - Couchdrop moves files to the cloud. The Cloud SFTP, FTP, SCP and Rsync server that works with Storage like Dropbox. Up and running in seconds. Fully hosted service. No worries.

Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.

SmartFile - Secure file sharing & FTP hosting for the ​enterprise.

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

Loading...