Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BountySource VS PullRequest.com

Compare BountySource VS PullRequest.com and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

BountySource logo BountySource

BountySource is a funding platform for open-source bugs and features.

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service
  • BountySource Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-23
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

PullRequest.com

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

BountySource features and specs

  • Funding Open Source Projects
    BountySource allows users to contribute financially to open source projects, enabling developers to receive financial support for their work.
  • Incentivizes Contributions
    By offering bounties, BountySource incentivizes developers to contribute to projects they might not have otherwise considered, increasing the likelihood of bug fixes and feature developments.
  • Community Engagement
    The platform promotes community involvement by allowing users to engage with projects they care about, either by funding or solving issues.
  • Flexible Bounty Management
    BountySource provides a flexible and user-friendly interface for both sponsors and developers to manage and track bounties.

Possible disadvantages of BountySource

  • Fees and Commission
    BountySource charges fees for transactions, which can reduce the amount received by developers and may deter potential contributors.
  • Project Visibility
    New or lesser-known projects may struggle to gain visibility on the platform, leading to fewer contributions to their bounties.
  • Resolution Delays
    Some users have reported delays in the resolution of bounties, which can be frustrating for both contributors and developers.
  • Limited User Base
    Compared to larger funding platforms, BountySource has a smaller user base, which may limit the number of available contributors and funding opportunities.

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

BountySource videos

Bitcoin Private Update - BTCP Pay - Zeltrez Wallet - BountySource - Get Down On It!

PullRequest.com videos

No PullRequest.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BountySource and PullRequest.com)
Crowdfunding
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Fundraising And Donation Management
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BountySource and PullRequest.com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BountySource should be more popular than PullRequest.com. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BountySource mentions (13)

  • whats the best bounty hunt program for foss projects?
    Well I used in the past https://bountysource.com/ but I don't see many people working on the bounties. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Is coding in Rust as bad as in C++?
    It is the first time I see it directly in GitHub, but there are already sites like https://bountysource.com which offer that. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Business model for company contributing to open source?
    So more like open-source bounties and platforms like Bountysource. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to donate
    I found a way to donate to a specific bounty on bountysource.com, but no way to support SCInitiative on https://thesciencecommons.org/donate/... No wallet, no bank account... Am I missing something? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Is there a paid service that promises to fix Linux issues?
    Https://bountysource.com/ is the most famous one I know of, although there are others: https://alternativeto.net/software/bountysource/. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BountySource and PullRequest.com, you can also consider the following products

Liberapay - Liberapay is a recurrent donations platform.

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Ko-fi - Ko-fi offers a friendly way for content creators to get paid for their work.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Patreon - Patreon enables fans to give ongoing support to their favorite creators.

Code Review by Codementor - Get an expert to review your code on-demand