Bottle VS Impossible I-1 Instant Camera
Compare Bottle VS Impossible I-1 Instant Camera and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
Bottle
Django
Flask
Node.js
Ruby on Rails
Laravel
Meteor
ASP.NET
Impossible I-1 Instant Camera
Polaroid Zip Instant
Cinebody
Impossible Instant Lab
Relonch Camera
Conmory
Dark Room
Clocr
BottleNo Impossible I-1 Instant Camera videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Bottle should be more popular than Impossible I-1 Instant Camera. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
We will use Bottle a lightweight web framework for python. This is the first time I use python to build a web server and it was a very positif experience. With Bottle.py, all you need is:. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Flask is simple and lightweight and as you said it give you flexibility. But if you want to have something that give you more flexibility and control over everything else besides the routing and server loop I would suggest bottle. It is a microframework, it is faster than flask and it is even more lightweight compared the other two I mentioned. But bare in mind that using bottle you have to proper select other... Source: over 1 year ago
If you want an even more trimmed down Flask, you can use Bottle. Source: over 1 year ago
Ok. Switch to python web framework and be happy. For example look at the Bottle - https://bottlepy.org/docs/dev/. Source: over 1 year ago
You should also take a look at Bottle. It's like mini-Flask, except the library is a single .py file. Great for doing one-off web dashboards, embedded web UI etc. https://bottlepy.org/docs/dev/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Polaroids, these days, are really Impossible Project, rebranded as Polaroid. They also now have cameras that shoot different format sizes, but you are no longer limited to using vintage cameras. You can do the full-sized Polaroids, but consistency on the film batch-to-batch may not be as good as with Fujifilm. Source: almost 2 years ago
That said, if you really truly want oldtimey Polaroid feel and square prints, I would forego Instax and take a chance on the new Polaroid (fka the Impossible Project) cameras. The main issue will be the expense and consistency of the film. Fuji's much better, but the prints are tiny in comparison to full-sized Polaroids, even the square and wide formats. Source: about 2 years ago
If you care more about the quality of the instant film print, then I'd say go look at the current Polaroid cameras (rebranded Impossible Project products, really). Source: over 2 years ago
I bought it here, but I think mine was limited edition. Source: over 2 years ago
If you're looking for something more in the $100 price range, maybe consider getting a new Polaroid or a Fuji Instax printer for her smartphone. Instant film/polaroid nostalgia can be fun, and this gear is brand new, and relatively low cost. Source: over 2 years ago
Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Polaroid Zip Instant - A pocket-sized device for instant photo printing
Flask - a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions.
Cinebody - Turn your iPhone into an 8mm camera!
Node.js - Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
Impossible Instant Lab - Transform your phone into a Polaroid-like, instant camera