Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bootstrap VS Ractive.js

Compare Bootstrap VS Ractive.js and see what are their differences

Bootstrap logo Bootstrap

Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Ractive.js logo Ractive.js

Ractive.js is different.
  • Bootstrap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22
  • Ractive.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-01

Bootstrap features and specs

  • Responsive Design
    Bootstrap's grid system ensures that webpages are responsive and adapt to different screen sizes seamlessly.
  • Pre-designed Components
    Bootstrap comes with a variety of pre-designed components like buttons, forms, modals, and navigation bars that streamline the development process.
  • Cross-browser Compatibility
    Bootstrap ensures that your website will function correctly across different browsers, reducing the time spent on debugging issues related to browser inconsistencies.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The documentation is comprehensive and well-organized, making it easier for developers to understand and implement Bootstrap features quickly.
  • Community Support
    With a large and active community, finding help and resources related to Bootstrap development is relatively easy.
  • Customizable
    Bootstrap allows you to customize the default styles and components using Sass variables, making it adaptable to any project needs.
  • CDN Support
    Bootstrap can be included via Content Delivery Networks (CDN), which can help to speed up the initial load time of your web pages.

Possible disadvantages of Bootstrap

  • Uniform Look
    Websites built with Bootstrap often look similar because many developers use the default styles and components without customization.
  • Overhead
    Including the entire Bootstrap library can add unnecessary weight to your project if you only use a small fraction of its features.
  • Learning Curve
    For beginners, the extensive set of features and classes can be overwhelming and take some time to learn.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Older versions of Bootstrap heavily rely on jQuery, which can be a disadvantage for projects that aim to minimize dependencies.
  • Specific Structure
    Bootstrap works best when you adhere to its predefined structure and classes, which can limit flexibility for more complex or unique designs.
  • Customization Challenges
    Deep customization can be difficult and time-consuming, especially if you need to override many default styles and behaviors.
  • Performance Issues
    Using a large number of Bootstrap components can lead to performance issues, particularly on lower-end devices.

Ractive.js features and specs

  • Reactivity
    Ractive.js provides built-in reactivity, allowing for automatic updates to the UI when the underlying data changes. This makes state management and UI synchronization straightforward and intuitive.
  • Two-way Data Binding
    It supports two-way data binding, which facilitates easy synchronization between the input elements in the UI and the data model, reducing boilerplate code.
  • Template-driven
    Ractive.js uses a template-driven approach that makes defining complex UIs simple and readable, enabling developers to focus more on structure rather than imperative DOM manipulations.
  • Component Architecture
    It offers a powerful component architecture that encourages reusability and modularity of code, which is useful for maintaining large applications.
  • Lightweight
    Compared to some of the larger frameworks, Ractive.js is relatively lightweight, which can lead to faster load times and better performance.

Possible disadvantages of Ractive.js

  • Smaller Community
    Ractive.js has a smaller user community compared to popular frameworks like React or Vue.js, which can result in fewer third-party resources, libraries, and community support.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Due to its smaller adoption rate, the ecosystem around Ractive.js is not as robust, limiting the availability of plugins and integrations with other tools.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers accustomed to more popular frameworks, there might be a learning curve involved with understanding Ractive.js's unique concepts and syntax.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    Ractive.js does not receive updates as frequently as other larger frameworks, which may impact the long-term maintenance of applications built with it.
  • Not as Feature-rich
    Some developers might find Ractive.js lacking certain advanced features and integrations that are present in competitors like Angular or React.

Bootstrap videos

Is Bootstrap Still Worth It? -- 1 Design, 2 Code Bases.

More videos:

  • Review - BOOTSTRAP Review | Best CSS Library ?
  • Review - Should you use Bootstrap?

Ractive.js videos

No Ractive.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bootstrap and Ractive.js)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Bootstrap and Ractive.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Bootstrap and Ractive.js

Bootstrap Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
Bootstrap alternatives are a suite of different tools and frameworks that web developers and designers employ for creating dynamic, responsive websites and applications. These tools, like Bootstrap itself, offer pre-written code for different elements of a website - from typography and buttons to navigation bars and image carousels - but each has its unique features and...
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
UIKit is a modular front-end framework like Bootstrap and a Bootstrap competitor designed to develop fast and powerful web interfaces. You can utilize it with HTML or JavaScript based on your preference. It offers built-in support for right-to-left languages and includes an extensive library of components. This framework like Bootstrap provides a convenient solution for...
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
The only downside it has as compared to Bootstrap and Foundation is it is only a CSS framework, which means no JavaScript. So you will have to write your own JavaScript or Jquery to toggle your dropdowns or perform other basic interactionhttps://bulma.io/s of the sort. Overall it is a great alternative to Bootstrap, which is also being updated very frequently.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Bootstrap is one of the most popular CSS frameworks globally and received instant popularity because of its responsive design. It was also the first framework that gave priority to mobile devices. With Bootstrap, there is no need for a separate design for mobile viewing. You just need to add the necessary classes, and the website will adapt to the screen size based on the...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
This is why Bootstrap is by far the most popular framework on the market. All developers have heard of Bootstrap, and more than 80% of them say they are happy using it.

Ractive.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Ractive.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bootstrap seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 362 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bootstrap mentions (362)

  • How to Build a Blog with Laravel (& Send Slack Notifications)
    This will show the posts passed from the controller in a row of cards. Please notice that you are linking to Bootstrap’s CDN for easy styling. If there are no posts, a message on a card saying that there are no posts will be shown. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • Overengineered Anchor Links
    Yeah, good point. It's kinda common to have a big footer. Examples: https://getbootstrap.com/, https://stake.us/ (casino) That way on desktop you could get away with a 50vh margin under the content and then another 50vh for the footer. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • The 3 Best Python Frameworks To Build UIs for AI Apps
    FastHTML allows developers to build modern web applications entirely in Python without touching JavaScript or React. As its name implies, it is quicker to begin with FastHTML. However, it does not have pre-built UI components and styling. Getting the best out of this framework requires the knowledge of HTMX and UI styling using CSS libraries like Tailwind and Bootstrap. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Tailwind CSS vs. Bootstrap: Which Framework is Better for Your Project?
    Bootstrap is one of the oldest and most established CSS frameworks, originally developed by Twitter in 2011. It takes a component-based approach to web development, providing a comprehensive collection of ready-to-use UI elements and prebuilt components. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How I Vibe-Coded an App to Explore GitHub Topics and Trending Repositories
    For the frontend, I had no prior experience, so I relied entirely on Claude's capabilities. 🙏 Claude generated the entire frontend in pure JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, and even added Bootstrap to it. This not only saved me a significant amount of time but also made my application responsive and visually appealing. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

Ractive.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ractive.js yet. Tracking of Ractive.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bootstrap and Ractive.js, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Famous Engine - The Famous Engine is a free and open source JavaScript rendering engine.

Bulma - Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.

FeathersJS - Wow your users. Build incredible real-time applications in record time.