Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Blocks.js VS Inferno

Compare Blocks.js VS Inferno and see what are their differences

Blocks.js logo Blocks.js

Deprecated repository. Contribute to Tixit/blocks.js development by creating an account on GitHub.

Inferno logo Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.
  • Blocks.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-20
  • Inferno Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11

Blocks.js features and specs

  • Modular Design
    Blocks.js allows for modular design construction with reusable and composable components, which enhances maintainability and scalability of projects.
  • Ease of Use
    The library is designed to be easy to use with a minimalistic approach, making it accessible for developers who want to build and manage DOM elements with less boilerplate.
  • Flexibility
    Blocks.js offers flexibility in building and managing UI components, enabling developers to create highly customized web interfaces without being restricted by typical framework constraints.
  • Efficient Component Updates
    It provides efficient ways to update the DOM, improving performance especially for applications that require frequent updates or changes to the UI.

Possible disadvantages of Blocks.js

  • Limited Popularity and Community Support
    Blocks.js is not as widely used as other UI libraries or frameworks, which might limit community support and resources available for troubleshooting or learning.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
    The library might not have exhaustive documentation, which can be a barrier for new users trying to learn and implement it properly.
  • Features Compared to Established Frameworks
    Compared to established frameworks like React or Angular, Blocks.js may lack some advanced features or optimizations, which could be crucial for certain complex applications.
  • Potential Integration Challenges
    Integrating Blocks.js with other libraries or existing projects might present challenges, especially if those projects are built with frameworks that have differing paradigms.

Inferno features and specs

  • High Performance
    Inferno is known for its impressive speed and performance, often comparable to or surpassing many other front-end frameworks and libraries, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
  • React-Like API
    Inferno uses a similar API to React, which makes it easier for developers who are already familiar with React to transition to or integrate Inferno.
  • Compatibility
    Due to its React-like API, Inferno can work with many existing React components and libraries, enhancing its versatility and integration capabilities.
  • Small Size
    Inferno has a small footprint, reducing load times and improving overall application performance, especially on mobile devices and slower networks.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Inferno supports server-side rendering out of the box, allowing for faster initial page loads and better SEO.

Possible disadvantages of Inferno

  • Smaller Community
    Inferno has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to more widely used libraries and frameworks like React, potentially leading to fewer resources, plugins, and support.
  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    While compatibility with React libraries is a strength, there are still fewer third-party libraries specifically designed for Inferno, which can limit development options in some scenarios.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are not familiar with React, there can be a learning curve associated with understanding the Inferno API and concepts.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Compared to larger projects like React, Inferno may have less frequent updates and new feature releases, which can impact the adoption of the latest web development trends.
  • Less Market Demand
    There is currently less market demand for developers proficient in Inferno compared to those skilled in more popular frameworks and libraries, potentially affecting job prospects and opportunities.

Blocks.js videos

No Blocks.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Inferno videos

Inferno - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Inferno - Movie Review
  • Review - Inferno - Official Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Blocks.js and Inferno)
Javascript UI Libraries
34 34%
66% 66
JavaScript Framework
34 34%
66% 66
Development
47 47%
53% 53
JavaScript
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Blocks.js and Inferno. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Blocks.js and Inferno

Blocks.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Blocks.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using
There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:
Source: jsreport.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Inferno seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Blocks.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Blocks.js yet. Tracking of Blocks.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Inferno mentions (2)

  • Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
    Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
    A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Blocks.js and Inferno, you can also consider the following products

Deku - Functional view library for building UI components as an alternative to React

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

w2ui - W2UI is a small JavaScript UI library with a complete set of widgets: layout, grid, sidebar, toolbar, tabs, fields, popup, utilities.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Glimmer - Fast and light-weight UI components for the web