Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

BlockCypher VS RxJS

Compare BlockCypher VS RxJS and see what are their differences

VisualVisitor
Consent-Based Identification of the Person Visiting Your Website Including First Name, Last Name, Email & 37 Other Data Points. Identify and Influence Your Engaged Website Visitors into Sales-Ready Leads – Before You Commit a Single Working Hour. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

BlockCypher logo BlockCypher

AWS for Block Chains

RxJS logo RxJS

Reactive Extensions for Javascript
  • BlockCypher Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • RxJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

BlockCypher features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    BlockCypher offers a simple API structure that makes integration with blockchain services straightforward, even for developers who are new to blockchain technology.
  • Multi-Blockchain Support
    Supports multiple blockchains, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Dogecoin, allowing developers to work with different cryptocurrencies in a unified platform.
  • Detailed Documentation
    Comprehensive and well-maintained documentation that helps developers understand and implement their APIs efficiently.
  • High Availability
    Designed for high availability and reliability, which ensures minimal downtime and consistent performance for applications.
  • Advanced Features
    Offers advanced APIs for tracking, creating, and managing transactions, contracts, and wallet functionalities, making it suitable for both basic and complex use cases.
  • Support for Microtransactions
    Offers support for microtransactions, which is beneficial for applications requiring small payments or tipping systems.

Possible disadvantages of BlockCypher

  • Costs
    While BlockCypher offers a free tier, higher usage plans can get expensive, which may not be suitable for startups or low-budget projects.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users might find that the service provides limited customization options, which can be restrictive for highly specialized use cases.
  • Dependency on Third Party
    Relying on a third-party service for blockchain interactions introduces dependency risks, including potential service downtime or changes in API terms.
  • Performance Overhead
    Using an external API can introduce performance bottlenecks due to network latency, compared to running a local solution.
  • Security Concerns
    Although secure, delegating sensitive operations to a third-party service raises security concerns, especially for high-stakes transactions.
  • Limited Control Over Nodes
    Developers do not have direct control over the blockchain nodes, which can occasionally lead to limitations in managing the blockchain environment.

RxJS features and specs

  • Asynchronous Programming Model
    RxJS allows you to work with asynchronous data streams with ease, enabling you to handle events, Ajax requests, and other asynchronous operations more effectively.
  • Composability
    RxJS operators enable developers to compose complex asynchronous operations concisely. This provides greater flexibility and power over handling streams of data.
  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    By using a functional programming approach, RxJS promotes cleaner and more predictable code. It encourages immutability and side-effect-free functions, enhancing code maintainability.
  • Rich Operator Set
    RxJS has a comprehensive set of operators, which allows developers to transform, combine, and filter data streams in various ways without needing to write a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    With its active community and extensive ecosystem, RxJS provides robust support, an abundance of learning resources, and numerous integrations with other libraries and frameworks.

Possible disadvantages of RxJS

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with reactive programming concepts or functional programming, understanding RxJS can be challenging, potentially leading to difficulty in adopting it.
  • Overhead for Simple Tasks
    Using RxJS for simple asynchronous tasks might add unnecessary complexity compared to native JavaScript promises or async/await due to its powerful abstractions.
  • Bundle Size
    In certain circumstances, incorporating RxJS might lead to increased bundle sizes, which can be a concern for web performance if not managed properly.
  • Complex Debugging
    RxJS introduces a level of abstraction that can make debugging more complex, especially when dealing with multiple combined and transformed data streams.
  • Performance Overhead
    While RxJS is powerful, its generalized approach to handling asynchronous stream processing can introduce performance overhead if not used judiciously.

BlockCypher videos

+ Add

Building with Blockchains and BlockCypher - Josh Cincinnati

More videos:

  • Review - FinDEVr SF 2015 / BlockCypher

RxJS videos

+ Add

RxJS is My Favorite Library

More videos:

  • Review - Reactive Programming with RxJS - James Churchill
  • Review - Tero Parviainen "Reactive Music Apps in Angular and RxJS"

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BlockCypher and RxJS)

BlockCypher

RxJS

Cloud Infrastructure
100 100%
Cloud Infrastructure
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Front-End Frameworks
0 0%
Front-End Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BlockCypher and RxJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BlockCypher seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BlockCypher mentions (2)

  • Wallet balance not correct?
    So I added old keys to MultiDoge and the wallets synced up but the balances show in MultiDoge doesn't seem to be correct. I've checked all addresses that I've added against blockcypher.com and it shows 0 balance on all but one which shows the same on Blockcypher and in MultiDoge. Is MultiDoge malfunctioning (Most likely I guess)? It shows that it's synced with the latest block. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Bitcoin newbie - sent 2 transactions with too low a fee (non replaceable).
    Thanks for that - really helpful video. Looks like my only option is to wait it out and have the transaction bounced back, but what I can't understand is that the receiver reckons they have it, yet when I try and look at the transaction id in blockstream.info its not there, but does show up under blockcypher.com Anyway, its coming up to a couple of weeks soon so will see what happens. Source: about 4 years ago

RxJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RxJS yet. Tracking of RxJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BlockCypher and RxJS, you can also consider the following products

Hyperledger - Hyperledger is a multi-project open source collaborative effort hosted by The Linux Foundation, created to advance cross-industry blockchain technologies.

Zustand - Bear necessities for state management in React

Kaleido Blockchain Business Cloud - Create and manage enterprise private blockchain networks within minutes using Kaleido's platform. Our full-stack enterprise blockchain as a service and cloud integrations support your entire blockchain journey, from PoC to live production.

MobX - Simple, scalable state management

Ethereum - Ethereum is a decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

Redux.js - Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

Loading...