Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Blitz.js VS React-Static

Compare Blitz.js VS React-Static and see what are their differences

Blitz.js logo Blitz.js

Rails-like framework for React apps, built on Next.js

React-Static logo React-Static

A progressive static-site framework for React!
  • Blitz.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-06
  • React-Static Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

Blitz.js features and specs

  • Fullstack Framework
    Blitz.js provides a cohesive experience by integrating both frontend and backend, enabling developers to focus more on building features than managing infrastructure.
  • Built on Next.js
    Being built on Next.js, Blitz.js benefits from the mature, well-maintained foundation of Next.js including its advanced routing, rendering optimizations, and powerful features.
  • Zero-API Data Layer
    Blitz.js eliminates the need for REST or GraphQL for client-server communication by allowing direct database access across the app, simplifying data management.
  • Community and Plugins
    A vibrant community and a growing ecosystem of plugins make it easier to extend and customize Blitz.js applications.
  • Authentication
    Blitz.js comes with built-in authentication and authorization, reducing the time and effort needed to implement security features in applications.

Possible disadvantages of Blitz.js

  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from traditional REST or GraphQL backgrounds, adjusting to Blitz.js's paradigm, especially the data layer, may take some time.
  • Early Stage
    As Blitz.js is relatively new, it may lack the stability, full-fledged documentation, and extensive community support found in more established frameworks.
  • Opinionated
    Blitz.js follows specific conventions and patterns, which might limit flexibility for developers wanting to deviate significantly from its architecture.
  • Compatibility
    Some existing libraries or tools might not yet fully support or integrate seamlessly with Blitz.js, potentially requiring additional effort or workarounds.
  • Performance Overhead
    The zero-API approach, while simplifying development, might introduce unanticipated performance overheads in certain scenarios, especially with large-scale data operations.

React-Static features and specs

  • Performance
    React-Static pre-renders pages and serves static files, leading to increased performance and faster load times compared to client-side rendering frameworks.
  • SEO Benefits
    By generating static pages, React-Static allows better indexing by search engines, making it more SEO-friendly than traditional single-page applications.
  • Developer Experience
    It offers a familiar React-based development experience and streamlined setup process, making it easier for developers already familiar with React.
  • Data Fetching
    React-Static supports various data fetching methods, allowing developers flexibility in pulling data from APIs or local files during build time.
  • Extensibility
    Its plugin architecture enables developers to extend functionalities, such as adding plugins for data fetching, routing, or SEO enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of React-Static

  • Build Time
    For larger sites with many pages, build times can increase significantly, which may be a drawback compared to server-side rendered solutions.
  • Dynamic Content
    Handling frequently updating or highly dynamic content can be challenging, as React-Static is optimized for static content.
  • Community and Support
    Compared to more popular alternatives like Next.js, React-Static has a smaller community, which might mean fewer third-party resources and less frequent updates.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to static site generation or React, understanding the nuances of React-Static and its build routines might require additional learning.
  • Limited Use Cases
    It is primarily beneficial for static sites, which means it might not be suitable for projects requiring extensive client-side interactivity or real-time features.

Blitz.js videos

Build apps at lightning speed with Blitz.js | Blitz.js Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - Let's Checkout... Blitz.js

React-Static videos

No React-Static videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Blitz.js and React-Static)
Developer Tools
60 60%
40% 40
Open Source
74 74%
26% 26
CMS
0 0%
100% 100
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Blitz.js and React-Static. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Blitz.js and React-Static

Blitz.js Reviews

10 Best Next.js Alternatives to Consider Today
Blitz.js is tailored for developers seeking to expedite full-stack React development. Blitz.js minimizes the time and effort required to set up and maintain a full-stack React application by offering a set of conventions, developer tools, and integrations. Its embrace of zero-API data fetching simplifies server-side data retrieval, eliminating the need for manual API...

React-Static Reviews

We have no reviews of React-Static yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

React-Static might be a bit more popular than Blitz.js. We know about 5 links to it since March 2021 and only 4 links to Blitz.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Blitz.js mentions (4)

React-Static mentions (5)

  • Django 4.0 will include a built-in Redis cache back end
    Django is still my go-to. Specifically [Django-REST-Framework](https://www.django-rest-framework.org/) with a front-end written with [react-static](https://github.com/react-static/react-static). Django's ORM is so nice and the ecosystem around it rocks. Its biggest downside is painful upgrades. They don't really follow [semantic versioning](https://semver.org/). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • react-static: anyone using or have experience with this library?
    I found a reference to react-static which looks like a nice fit for a project I'm working on but there isn't much recent activity in the repo. I'm not sure if that means it's basically done and just works or if it has fallen out of maintenance. I see it's from Tanner Linsley so that's a good endorsement on its own but just wondering if anyone has used it for production code lately. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Static site generators to watch in 2021
    I still like react-static. Minimalism on react: https://github.com/react-static/react-static. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • Nice repos/tools/posts - 1st April - #1
    Link : https://github.com/react-static/react-static. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • How to create a single-page static site?
    Gatsby looks nice, but it is a no-go for reasons that I do not understand. The recommendation seems to include sapper, but svelte is not good for ClojureScript either, as it relies on mutable data. I could not find information about other alternatives to use with ClojureScript, like React-static. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Blitz.js and React-Static, you can also consider the following products

Refine - A React Framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards & B2B apps with unmatched flexibilty.

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React

Jumpsuit - A minimal React and Redux framework

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

GitHub Personal Website Generator - Generate a personal website based on GitHub contributions

Flawwwless ui - Simplified open source React.js components library 🚀