Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Blitz.js VS Draft.js

Compare Blitz.js VS Draft.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Blitz.js logo Blitz.js

Rails-like framework for React apps, built on Next.js

Draft.js logo Draft.js

Rich Text Editor Framework for React
  • Blitz.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-06
  • Draft.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29

Blitz.js features and specs

  • Fullstack Framework
    Blitz.js provides a cohesive experience by integrating both frontend and backend, enabling developers to focus more on building features than managing infrastructure.
  • Built on Next.js
    Being built on Next.js, Blitz.js benefits from the mature, well-maintained foundation of Next.js including its advanced routing, rendering optimizations, and powerful features.
  • Zero-API Data Layer
    Blitz.js eliminates the need for REST or GraphQL for client-server communication by allowing direct database access across the app, simplifying data management.
  • Community and Plugins
    A vibrant community and a growing ecosystem of plugins make it easier to extend and customize Blitz.js applications.
  • Authentication
    Blitz.js comes with built-in authentication and authorization, reducing the time and effort needed to implement security features in applications.

Possible disadvantages of Blitz.js

  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from traditional REST or GraphQL backgrounds, adjusting to Blitz.js's paradigm, especially the data layer, may take some time.
  • Early Stage
    As Blitz.js is relatively new, it may lack the stability, full-fledged documentation, and extensive community support found in more established frameworks.
  • Opinionated
    Blitz.js follows specific conventions and patterns, which might limit flexibility for developers wanting to deviate significantly from its architecture.
  • Compatibility
    Some existing libraries or tools might not yet fully support or integrate seamlessly with Blitz.js, potentially requiring additional effort or workarounds.
  • Performance Overhead
    The zero-API approach, while simplifying development, might introduce unanticipated performance overheads in certain scenarios, especially with large-scale data operations.

Draft.js features and specs

  • Rich Text Editing
    Draft.js provides a powerful framework for building rich text editors with a high level of customization, allowing developers to implement various formatting and styling options with ease.
  • Immutable.js Integration
    Draft.js uses Immutable.js to manage editor state, which can lead to improved performance and easier state management, as it helps avoid unnecessary re-renders and mutations.
  • Extensibility
    The library offers the ability to create custom blocks, decorations, and plugins, enabling developers to extend and tailor the editor's behavior to their specific needs.
  • Facebook Support
    Draft.js is developed and maintained by Facebook, which suggests a certain level of reliability and indicates a strong backing in terms of updates and community support.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library is well-documented, with comprehensive guides and examples that help developers get started quickly and understand the full potential of the framework.

Possible disadvantages of Draft.js

  • Complexity
    Draft.js has a steep learning curve, especially for developers who are not familiar with React or Immutable.js, as it requires understanding its unique architecture and concepts.
  • Bundle Size
    The inclusion of Immutable.js can lead to a larger bundle size for web applications, which might be a concern for developers aiming for minimalistic and fast-loading applications.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Draft.js provides a basic editor out of the box, which means developers often need to implement or find third-party plugins for advanced features like tables, embedded media, or collaborative editing.
  • Customizability Overhead
    While high customizability is a strength, it also means that basic implementations may involve more boilerplate code and setup compared to other, more out-of-the-box solutions.
  • Sparse Updates
    Draft.js does not receive updates as frequently as some other open-source projects, which can lead to uncertainty around the timeline for bug fixes or new feature implementations.

Blitz.js videos

Build apps at lightning speed with Blitz.js | Blitz.js Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - Let's Checkout... Blitz.js

Draft.js videos

Live coding – Draft.js copy-paste fix

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Blitz.js and Draft.js)
Developer Tools
66 66%
34% 34
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Open Source
100 100%
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Blitz.js and Draft.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Blitz.js and Draft.js

Blitz.js Reviews

10 Best Next.js Alternatives to Consider Today
Blitz.js is tailored for developers seeking to expedite full-stack React development. Blitz.js minimizes the time and effort required to set up and maintain a full-stack React application by offering a set of conventions, developer tools, and integrations. Its embrace of zero-API data fetching simplifies server-side data retrieval, eliminating the need for manual API...

Draft.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Draft.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Draft.js should be more popular than Blitz.js. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Blitz.js mentions (4)

Draft.js mentions (26)

  • Lexical 0.24 with Vanilla JS: Getting started
    Lexical is an open source project and considered the successor of Draft.js. It is primarily developed by Meta, licensed under MIT. It is not restricted to React, but supports Vanilla JS, too. The flexibility enables us to integrate it with other JS libraries such as Svelte and Vue. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Ask HN: Is there a licensable/free version of the "Substack" email editor?
    - https://draftjs.org/ If you're talking about liking the full experience with settings and previews, that I'm afraid is all custom built. I can't imagine an open source reusable one being out there, but I could be wrong! - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Which Rich Text Editor to use ?
    I've always used Quill and always satisfied with it. It can be adapted to React Native as well. Despite the most popular RTE is Draft js it has some limitations on mobile. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Inline styles in draft-js
    To be able to create an editor, the only requirement is to know how to set up a ReactJS (or NextJs) project. We're going to use draft-js and contenido packages in this tutorial. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • A brief introduction to draft-js
    Briefly and as the draft-js official site says, its a. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Blitz.js and Draft.js, you can also consider the following products

Refine - A React Framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards & B2B apps with unmatched flexibilty.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Jumpsuit - A minimal React and Redux framework

Editor.js - A block-styled editor with clean JSON output

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

Trix - A rich text editor for everyday writing.