BitNinja.io VS Ubuntu Linux Security

I tried Imunify at beta/launch and wasn't impressed. We went with BitNinja for a few years and it worked well enough. It seemed to have pretty significant resource requirements despite a lot of the heavy lifting being done off network. We switched to Imunify360 a year or so back after seeing how polished it has become. It integrates well with cPanel (user management of scanning/etc.) and JetBackup (restoring... Source: about 1 year ago

Bitninja.io — Botnet protection through a blacklist, free plan only reports limited information on each attack. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

From TFA: > Ubuntu Pro expands security coverage for critical, high and medium Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) to thousands of applications and toolchains, including Ansible, Apache Tomcat, Apache Zookeeper, Docker, Drupal, Nagios, Node.js, phpMyAdmin, Puppet, PowerDNS, Python 2, Redis, Rust, WordPress, and more. So sounds like coverage of a bunch of stuff in their Universe repository that is not part... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Sorry to burst your bubble but Ubuntu has automatic security updates by default since 2016. It is also very easily configurable either to disable it outright or even make all updates automatically download and/or install. This is the update settings dialog and you can confirm automatic updates on the Ubuntu page on security if you scroll down a bit. I remember being a lot of noise when this was introduced because... Source: about 2 years ago