Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

BitKeeper VS Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Compare BitKeeper VS Atlassian Bitbucket Server and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

BitKeeper logo BitKeeper

BitKeeper is an open source distributed version control tool.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server logo Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.
  • BitKeeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Atlassian Bitbucket Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

BitKeeper features and specs

  • Scalability
    BitKeeper is designed to handle large projects efficiently, making it suitable for projects with extensive codebases and many developers.
  • Distributed Version Control
    BitKeeper follows a distributed model, allowing developers to work independently and merge changes, which enhances collaboration and reduces bottlenecks.
  • Performance
    The system is optimized for speed, enabling fast operations even in large projects with extensive histories.
  • Data Integrity
    BitKeeper places a strong emphasis on data integrity, ensuring that repository data remains consistent and secure.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, which provides flexibility for diverse development environments.

Possible disadvantages of BitKeeper

  • Proprietary Nature
    While BitKeeper had opened up its code, its origin as a proprietary product led to trust issues and limited initial adoption in certain communities.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Compared to other version control systems like Git, BitKeeper has a smaller community and fewer integrations, which may limit its adoption and available resources.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers accustomed to more common systems like Git or Mercurial, BitKeeper may present a steeper learning curve.
  • Limited Popularity
    BitKeeper is not as widely used as other version control systems, which means it might be harder to find support or talent experienced with the tool.
  • Marketing and Momentum
    Despite its features, BitKeeper does not have the same level of marketing presence or momentum as some of its competitors, like Git.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server features and specs

  • Scalability
    Bitbucket Server can be scaled easily to support large and growing teams, making it suitable for enterprises.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence, enhancing productivity and collaboration.
  • Data Control
    Being self-hosted, Bitbucket Server allows organizations to have complete control over their data and security settings.
  • Customization
    Support for custom hooks and add-ons allows for high levels of customization to meet specific workflow requirements.
  • Performance
    Optimized for performance to handle large repositories and numerous concurrent users efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Atlassian Bitbucket Server

  • Cost
    The cost for the data center edition can be high, especially for smaller teams or startups.
  • Maintenance
    Requires dedicated resources for server maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting, adding to the operational overhead.
  • Complexity
    Setup and configuration can be complex, often necessitating specialized knowledge or training.
  • Limited Cloud Features
    May lack some features and the ease of use found in cloud-based solutions, which can be a drawback for teams looking for a more straightforward setup.
  • Resource Intensive
    Can be resource-intensive, requiring powerful hardware to run efficiently, especially for larger installations.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BitKeeper and Atlassian Bitbucket Server)

BitKeeper

Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Git
26 26%
Git
74% 74
Code Collaboration
27 27%
Code Collaboration
73% 73
Version Control
27 27%
Version Control
73% 73
Git Tools
29 29%
Git Tools
71% 71

User comments

Share your experience with using BitKeeper and Atlassian Bitbucket Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BitKeeper seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BitKeeper mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: What VCS to use for binary files only?
    If you're feeling adventurous, [bitkeeper](https://bitkeeper.org) handles binaries well. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Atlassian Bitbucket Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Atlassian Bitbucket Server yet. Tracking of Atlassian Bitbucket Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BitKeeper and Atlassian Bitbucket Server, you can also consider the following products

GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Apache Subversion - Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

Tower - Build Better Software. Over 100,000 developers and designers are more productive with Tower - the most powerful Git client for Mac and Windows.

Loading...