Software Alternatives & Reviews

bitHound VS Softagram

Compare bitHound VS Softagram and see what are their differences

bitHound logo bitHound

Discover, monitor and address the complexity, maintainability and fragility of your software

Softagram logo Softagram

Automated visual reviews for GitHub pull requests
  • bitHound Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Softagram Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25

bitHound videos

No bitHound videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Softagram videos

How to improve code quality and review time, Softagram Pull Request Analysis Explained in 2min

More videos:

  • Review - Softagram Pull Requests review automation
  • Review - Softagram visual change review from pull request to browsable view

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bitHound and Softagram)
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Code Quality
100 100%
0% 0
Crowdfunding
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using bitHound and Softagram. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bitHound and Softagram, you can also consider the following products

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Mergefly - A modern UI for GitHub pull requests

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

GitHub Reader - A quick way to browse GitHub issues and pull requests.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Contractbook - Helping businesses scale with future-proof contracts