Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BitBucket VS GNU Make

Compare BitBucket VS GNU Make and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

BitBucket logo BitBucket

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
  • BitBucket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12

BitBucket features and specs

  • Integration with Atlassian Suite
    BitBucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian products like Jira, Confluence, and Trello, enabling end-to-end project management and enhanced collaboration capabilities.
  • Unlimited Private Repositories
    BitBucket offers unlimited private repositories, which is a significant advantage for developers and organizations that prioritize privacy and want to manage multiple projects securely.
  • Built-in CI/CD
    BitBucket Pipelines provides integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) right out of the box, making it easier for teams to automate their workflows and deploy code faster.
  • Cost-Effective
    BitBucket offers competitive pricing plans, including a free tier that supports small teams with essential features, making it accessible for startups and small to medium-sized businesses.
  • Strong Branch Permissions
    BitBucket allows for granular branch permissions, enabling teams to control who can read, write, and merge their code, enhancing security and boosting code quality.

Possible disadvantages of BitBucket

  • User Interface
    Some users find BitBucket's user interface less intuitive compared to competitors like GitHub and GitLab, which can lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Performance Issues
    There can be occasional performance issues, particularly with larger repositories or heavy traffic, which can slow down the development and deployment processes.
  • Smaller Community
    BitBucket has a smaller user community compared to GitHub, which may result in fewer third-party integrations, plugins, and community-driven support resources.
  • Limited Marketplace
    The BitBucket Marketplace offers fewer integrations and extensions compared to its competitors, which might limit customization options for advanced users or larger teams.
  • Less Popular for Open Source Projects
    BitBucket is less popular for hosting open-source projects compared to platforms like GitHub, which might be a drawback for teams looking to engage with a broader open-source community.

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

Analysis of BitBucket

Overall verdict

  • Bitbucket is a reliable and effective platform for version control and code collaboration, especially for teams already using Atlassian products.

Why this product is good

  • Bitbucket is considered good for several reasons. It provides robust support for Git and Mercurial repositories, offering a flexible platform for development teams. It integrates well with Atlassian's suite of tools, such as Jira and Confluence, enhancing project management capabilities. Bitbucket also offers strong branch permissions and code review capabilities, which are essential for maintaining code quality in collaborative environments.

Recommended for

    Bitbucket is recommended for software development teams that need strong integration with Jira and Confluence, teams looking for private repository support, and organizations that prioritize customizable workflows and detailed permission settings.

Analysis of GNU Make

Overall verdict

  • Yes, GNU Make is a robust and reliable tool for managing build processes. Its long-established reputation and widespread use in both open-source and commercial projects underline its effectiveness and flexibility.

Why this product is good

  • GNU Make is widely used because it automates the build process, efficiently handling dependencies and detecting minimal sets of changes in source files. It is highly customizable, supports non-recursive builds, and integrates well into various development environments.

Recommended for

  • Software developers working on C/C++ projects
  • Teams looking to automate build processes
  • Projects that require cross-platform build capabilities
  • Developers who prefer command-line tools
  • Open-source project maintainers

BitBucket videos

Bitbucket tutorial | How to use Bitbucket Cloud

More videos:

  • Review - Jira & Bitbucket Pull Request and Code Review Part-3 (Last Part)

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BitBucket and GNU Make)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BitBucket and GNU Make. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BitBucket and GNU Make

BitBucket Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Bitbucket offers several hosting options, including Cloud, Server, and Data Centre. Each option has its own unique features and benefits. For example, Bitbucket Cloud is hosted on Atlassian’s servers and accessed via a URL. It has an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool, Pipelines, that enables you to build, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
Most of the listed alternatives offer free tier plans for individuals or small teams. Tools like GitLab and Bitbucket allow users to host unlimited repositories without cost.
Source: snappify.com
Best GitHub Alternatives for Developers in 2023
Bitbucket Pipes provides over 50 plug-and-play integrations (code quality, deployment, incident management, etc.) for extended CI/CD workflow automation. Speaking of integrations, Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian programming tools like Opsgenie and Confluence, as well as third-party tools like CircleCI, GitHub and Jenkins.
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
The Pull Request workflow is so dominant now that it’s considered the default path for code to permanently enter into a repository. You can see a similar features in GitHub’s smaller competition Codeberg, GitLab, BitBucket, and Gitea. These competitors don’t offer other, major code collaboration tools, and their Pull Request-like features aren’t just there to help users come...
Free Data Science Tools for Students and Educators in 2020
You can get free unlimited private Git repositories at Bitbucket. If you already have a GitHub Pro, you may wonder why Bitbucket

GNU Make Reviews

We have no reviews of GNU Make yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BitBucket seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 78 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BitBucket mentions (78)

View more

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BitBucket and GNU Make, you can also consider the following products

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.