Extravagant yourself the educated sort? Assuming this is the case, you can get compensated to try out new sites and portable applications and chase down any errors. At http://UserTesting.com, for instance, you get to test new locales and items from brands like GoDaddy, Hello Fresh, HP, Subway and Canva. You simply have to have a solid WiFi association, a receiver, a PC or cell phone and you can get to work.... Source: almost 2 years ago

I used https://betatesting.com/ recently (moderated) and they were really nice to deal with. Source: almost 2 years ago

I would say no. Mocking is generally creating a mock object. Like with Mockito. https://site.mockito.org. Source: about 1 year ago

Could you explain how this relates to Mockito? Could it be used together perhaps for more advanced mocking? Source: over 1 year ago

You could use mocks, but you'd basically be implementing JSch. I'm not mocking a framework, and recently learned my misgivings have a name: the soviet police station anti-pattern. Source: over 1 year ago

In Mockito it exists the possibilty to use ArgumentCaptor to allow developers to verify the arguments used during the call of mocked method, but not the result itself. Indeed, in the current release of Mockito it's not possible to capture it and my solution to do that is to build a ResultCaptor class which implements the Answer interface and generify it for more conveniance. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

So I am building my own little project, which you can read about HERE and I have made the decision to use as few libraries as possible. Now that I am doing some testing I need some mock objects, which means I have to try to recreate Mockito. So this series will be me recreating Mockito the best I can. This post will be about creating a simple single use case implementation that gets our annotation working. It... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago