Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Beta Testing VS GitLive

Compare Beta Testing VS GitLive and see what are their differences

Beta Testing logo Beta Testing

Beta Testing is an all-in-one feature-rich technical testing solution created to help small to large size businesses test and enhance their products through insights.

GitLive logo GitLive

Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers
  • Beta Testing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21
  • GitLive Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-08

📣 The future of social coding

Connect. ◾️See when your fellow contributors are online and which repos, branches and files they are working on. Automated. ◾️Connect your issue tracker to share what issue you are working on based on your current branch.

📣 Resolve conflicts before they happen

Live. ◾️ See others' local changes in the gutter of your editor and get notified the moment you make a conflicting change. Patch. ◾️View diffs of other contributors' local files and cherry‑pick individual lines, files or complete working copies.

📣 Code together in real‑time

Codeshare. ◾️Make voice and video calls directly from your editor and codeshare to see each others cursors.
Agnostic. ◾️Edit together simultaneously, interoperable between VS Code and all JetBrains IDEs.

Beta Testing features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

GitLive features and specs

  • Real time collaboration: Yes
  • Communication & Notifications: Yes
  • Code Editor: yes

Beta Testing videos

$10 To $25 Per Test | Make Money Testing Websites And Apps | Beta Testing /Early Bird [Hindi/Urdu]

GitLive videos

Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Beta Testing and GitLive)
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100
Error Tracking
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Beta Testing and GitLive. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitLive should be more popular than Beta Testing. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Beta Testing mentions (2)

GitLive mentions (3)

  • Building Remote Teams for Startups
    There are plenty of tools that have started popping up to try and improve this situation since last year. CodeTogether, Duckly, Code With Me, and GitLive to name a few. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Dev resources and articles plus news from Huawei's Android alternative HarmonyOS, Mozilla launches MDN Plus, and more.
    GitLive. Extend your IDE with the real-time features remote development teams need to work together effectively. See what your teammates are working on and get notified of merge conflicts before you commit. Make video calls and code together live, VS Code to JetBrains. [GITLIVE]. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • Closest too to intellij conflict resolution?
    This is in no way an answer to your question but perhaps you would find git.live's merge conflict detection feature useful to potentially avoid the conflicts in the first place 😅. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Beta Testing and GitLive, you can also consider the following products

DevTest - Test management solution for efficient quality assurance

CodeStream - CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE

ReQtest - ReQtest is an end to end solution for test management, bug tracking, requirement management and agile project management.

CodeTogether - Live share IDEs and coding sessions. See changes in real time.

Rapise - Discover Rapise, the cross-browser, automated software testing tool with the most powerful and flexible test automation features on the market. Try it today!

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.