Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Beanstalkd VS Apache ActiveMQ

Compare Beanstalkd VS Apache ActiveMQ and see what are their differences

Beanstalkd logo Beanstalkd

Beanstalk is a simple, fast work queue.

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
  • Beanstalkd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-02
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

Beanstalkd features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Beanstalkd is designed for ease of use, with a simple and straightforward protocol that makes it easy to set up and manage.
  • Performance
    Beanstalkd provides high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for applications that require fast messaging.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    Beanstalkd is lightweight and has minimal dependencies, making it easy to deploy and integrate into existing systems.
  • Reliable Queueing
    Beanstalkd provides reliable job queueing with persistent storage, ensuring that messages are not lost in the case of failure.
  • Priority Support
    Jobs in Beanstalkd can be assigned priority levels, enabling important tasks to be processed before lower priority ones.

Possible disadvantages of Beanstalkd

  • Limited Feature Set
    Beanstalkd offers a basic set of features and lacks some advanced capabilities found in other message queue systems, such as complex routing or message filtering.
  • No Native Support for Clustering
    Beanstalkd does not provide built-in clustering or distributed support, potentially limiting its scalability on its own.
  • No Built-in Security
    Beanstalkd lacks built-in security features, such as encryption or authentication, requiring additional measures to secure the system.
  • Limited Persistence Options
    While Beanstalkd does provide persistence, its options are limited compared to other message brokers, which might be a consideration for data durability requirements.
  • Community and Support
    Beanstalkd has a relatively small community and less commercial support, which may limit access to help and resources compared to more popular alternatives.

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Beanstalkd and Apache ActiveMQ)
Data Integration
19 19%
81% 81
Web Service Automation
19 19%
81% 81
Stream Processing
17 17%
83% 83
Ruby On Rails
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Beanstalkd and Apache ActiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Beanstalkd and Apache ActiveMQ

Beanstalkd Reviews

We have no reviews of Beanstalkd yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ActiveMQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Beanstalkd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Beanstalkd yet. Tracking of Beanstalkd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Beanstalkd and Apache ActiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

Amazon SQS - Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.