Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Barracuda Web Security Gateway VS Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways

Compare Barracuda Web Security Gateway VS Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways and see what are their differences

Barracuda Web Security Gateway logo Barracuda Web Security Gateway

Barracuda Web Security Gateway filters content, malware, social media and rogue app threats.

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways logo Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways offers secure internet access for the employees.
  • Barracuda Web Security Gateway Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

Barracuda Web Security Gateway features and specs

  • Comprehensive Threat Protection
    Barracuda Web Security Gateway provides robust protection against malware, viruses, and other online threats, helping ensure network security.
  • Content Filtering
    The product allows administrators to filter web content and manage applications, providing control over the types of content accessible to users.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Reporting
    It offers real-time monitoring and detailed reporting capabilities, enabling administrators to track user activity and network performance effectively.
  • Ease of Management
    The centralized management interface is user-friendly, making it easier to configure policies and manage network security settings.
  • Scalability
    The solution is designed to be highly scalable, making it suitable for both small and large organizations looking to protect their web traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Barracuda Web Security Gateway

  • Performance Impact
    Some users may experience a slight decrease in network performance due to the overhead introduced by constant monitoring and filtering.
  • Complex Initial Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring knowledgeable IT staff to ensure optimal deployment and integration.
  • Cost
    The solution may be considered expensive for smaller organizations or those with limited IT budgets, especially considering ongoing maintenance costs.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users may find customization options limited, which can be a drawback for organizations with specific or unique security needs.
  • Dependence on Internet Connectivity
    As cloud-based services are integral to its functionality, any disruption in internet connectivity can impact the service's effectiveness.

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways features and specs

  • Comprehensive Protection
    Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways offers extensive security measures including anti-malware, anti-phishing, and web control, providing robust protection against a wide range of threats.
  • Real-time Traffic Scanning
    The solution includes real-time scanning of web traffic, ensuring that threats are detected and neutralized before they can infiltrate the network.
  • High Performance and Low Latency
    Despite its comprehensive security features, the software is optimized for high performance, resulting in minimal impact on network speed and user experience.
  • Cloud-Assisted Intelligence
    Utilizes cloud-assisted technology for real-time threat intelligence and updates, ensuring the most current protection against emerging threats.
  • Customizable Policies
    Allows network administrators to set and customize security policies according to their specific organizational needs and compliance requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways

  • Complexity in Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and may require advanced IT knowledge or professional assistance.
  • Subscription and Licensing Costs
    Ongoing subscription and licensing fees can be relatively high, especially for small to medium-sized businesses with limited budgets.
  • Resource-Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring more robust hardware to handle peak loads effectively.
  • Potential for False Positives
    There is a possibility of false positives where legitimate traffic can be mistakenly flagged as malicious, potentially disrupting business operations.
  • Vendor Trust Concerns
    Due to geopolitical factors and concerns about privacy implications, some organizations may hesitate to use Kaspersky products.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Barracuda Web Security Gateway and Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways)
Cyber Security
32 32%
68% 68
Web Security
58 58%
42% 42
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
26 26%
74% 74

User comments

Share your experience with using Barracuda Web Security Gateway and Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Barracuda Web Security Gateway and Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways, you can also consider the following products

McAfee SmartFilter - McAfee Web Protection is a web security solution that includes an on-premises secure web gateway and SaaS-based web security delivered from the cloud.

Cisco Umbrella - Cisco Umbrella is a cloud security platform that provides the first line of defense against threats on the internet.

Forcepoint Web Security - Seguridad Web De Última Generación Para La Fuerza Laboral Global Del Futuro

OpenDNS Umbrella - Cloud Security

WebTitan - WebTitan is an advanced DNS based web content filter and web security layer that blocks malware, ransomware and phishing attempts as well as providing web content control. Cloud and gateway versions available.

iboss - iboss is an APT defense, web security and mobile security platform.