Software Alternatives & Reviews

Babel VS PixiJS

Compare Babel VS PixiJS and see what are their differences

Babel logo Babel

Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

PixiJS logo PixiJS

Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.
  • Babel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-02
  • PixiJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

Babel videos

Babel - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Day 16 | Babel Review | 365 Films
  • Review - Worth The Hype? - BABEL Review
  • Review - Book CommuniTEA: Is BABEL a rac1st mani!fest0? [you should know the answer]
  • Review - Babel is a Masterpiece, And Here's Why

PixiJS videos

PixiJS Part 3: Renderer, Ticker, & Stage

More videos:

  • Review - Learn PixiJS in 20 Minutes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Babel and PixiJS)
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
76 76%
24% 24
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100
Libraries And Widgets
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Babel and PixiJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Babel should be more popular than PixiJS. It has been mentiond 134 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Babel mentions (134)

  • How, and why, you should add JavaScript linting to your project. With ESLint and Gulp
    Some of the most popular JavaScript linting tools are ESLint, JSHint, JSLint and JSCS. We're going to be using ESLint. It’s very flexible, easy to use and has the best ES6 support, which will be helpful if we introduce more modern JavaScript (that will be transpiled for older browsers using https://babeljs.io/). All rules for ESLint can be found here: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • What is Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)?
    This simply extends the existing build process that many front-end frameworks have. After Babel's done with its transpilation, it merely executes code to compile your initial screen into static HTML and CSS. This isn't entirely dissimilar from how SSR hydrates your initial screen, but it's done at compile-time, not at request time. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Storybook 8 Beta
    First, we switched the default compiler for new projects from Babel to SWC (Speedy Web Compiler). SWC is dramatically faster than Babel and requires zero configuration. We’ll continue to support Babel in any project currently using it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Nuxt vs Next: Which JavaScript Framework Suits Your Next Project?
    Nuxt.js is an open-source JavaScript framework built on Vue.js, Node.js, Vite, and Babel.js used for creating fast, cutting-edge applications. Nuxt.js possesses similar features to Next.js, with the major difference being the web framework it is compatible with. Next.js is a React framework whereas Nuxt.js is a Vue framework. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Abstract Syntax Trees and Practical Applications in JavaScript
    Disclaimer: If you've already developed Babel or ESLint plugins, this article may not be as beneficial for you, as you're likely already familiar with the majority of the content covered here. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

PixiJS mentions (68)

  • JSON Canvas – An open file format for infinite canvas data
    The canvas in Obsidian is as the whole app very well made. I wondered what they are using as well. My guess is https://www.xyflow.com/, which is for drawing nodes. More general purpose would be http://fabricjs.com/. Or very low level https://pixijs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • A Visual Interactive Guide to Bloom Filters
    Https://pixijs.com/ and https://gsap.com/. All of the source code for my posts can be found at https://github.com/samwho/visualisations :). - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • My thought on different engines
    For full web games (yeah, I come from the web, so I try to make my family proud), I will recommend PixiJS. It has great support for TypeScript and works very well with Vite. It's lighter than other game engines, so it's better for web games. But you will need to do a lot of things by yourself. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: Possible to make a game engine in the browser?
    Https://openarena.live/ There's also a bunch of Javascript game engines: https://github.com/collections/javascript-game-engines Or PixiJS for 2D: https://pixijs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Rebuilding Isometric World
    That approach works well for what I was trying to archive but I am planning on adding more functionality into the website. Hence in this article, let me rebuild the project using Pixi.js and it’s React binding, React Pixi. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Babel and PixiJS, you can also consider the following products

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Three.js - A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Phaser - Desktop and Mobile HTML5 game framework. A fast, free and fun open source framework for Canvas and WebGL powered browser games.

Composer - Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences