Azure Storage VS Spinal CMS

Microsoft Azure Storage is another option for hosting a static website, with a range of pricing plans to suit different needs. It offers features like custom domains and SSL certificates, and it's highly scalable and reliable. Also Azure Storage can be more expensive than some other options, especially for high-traffic websites. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I'd start here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/ and mainly look at either FILE (for ease of use, though probably not great if you want to host the share to your community), or BLOB - if you're semi-comfortable with cloud computing and might want to setup a static website or something hosting this content. The next big question is tier - if only a few people are ever going to look at this stuff... Source: about 3 years ago

There are a few SSG that come with a (local, ie. Run it locally) CMS. A better option, imo, is to choose any SSG you like, written in a language you know and add Spinal as the CMS. Makes editing content as simple as WordPress. If you need more customisation next to content it's not a good fit though. Source: about 1 year ago

Just want to offer that at Spinal (a CMS for static site generators, like the ones mentioned in the comments) we offer a free tier for open source projects. Feel free to reach for any questions. ✌️. Source: about 1 year ago

There are many options available for hosting a static website, and the best choice will depend on your specific needs and budget. Here are a few providers that offer hosting for static websites, along with some pros and cons for each. For example, not all provide Git integration out-of-the-box. Which means extra work from your side to get that buttery-smooth publishing (push-to-deploy) workflow (that also makes... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

At Spinal, the micro-SaaS I've founded I'm all-in on this “boring Rails stack”. It helps me ship features quickly without a lot of overhead. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago