Azure Storage VS Openstack Swift

Microsoft Azure Storage is another option for hosting a static website, with a range of pricing plans to suit different needs. It offers features like custom domains and SSL certificates, and it's highly scalable and reliable. Also Azure Storage can be more expensive than some other options, especially for high-traffic websites. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I'd start here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/ and mainly look at either FILE (for ease of use, though probably not great if you want to host the share to your community), or BLOB - if you're semi-comfortable with cloud computing and might want to setup a static website or something hosting this content. The next big question is tier - if only a few people are ever going to look at this stuff... Source: about 3 years ago

By 'swift', he's probably talking about OpenStack Swift [1]. [1] https://docs.openstack.org/swift/latest/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

I would look into Swift https://docs.openstack.org/swift/latest/. Source: 12 months ago

> Had some data in Rackspace Files where "list files" would say X existed, but "GET X" got you a 404. Well yes, Rackspace Files (aka OpenStack Swift) is eventually consistent. It says so literally in the first sentence of the documentation [1]. But this discussion is about relational databases with ACID guarantees, where the C is literally "consistent". [1] https://docs.openstack.org/swift/latest/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Suggestion: title should be renamed to "Protocol Oriented Programming and Testing in Swift". "Swift Protocol" is something else entirely https://docs.openstack.org/swift/latest/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago