Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Functions VS Fission.io

Compare Azure Functions VS Fission.io and see what are their differences

Azure Functions logo Azure Functions

Azure Functions is a serverless event driven experience that extends the existing Azure App Service platform.

Fission.io logo Fission.io

Fission.io is a serverless framework for Kubernetes that supports many concepts such as event triggers, parallel execution, and statelessness.
  • Azure Functions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-26
  • Fission.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-19

Azure Functions features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure Functions offers automatic scaling based on demand, which means it can handle varying workloads without manual adjustments.
  • Cost-effective
    With its consumption-based pricing model, you only pay for the compute resources used during function execution, making it cost-effective for many scenarios.
  • Simplified Development
    Developers can focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure management, including server provisioning and maintenance.
  • Multiple Language Support
    Azure Functions supports a wide range of programming languages, including C#, JavaScript, Python, and more, offering flexibility for developers.
  • Integration with Azure Services
    Azure Functions seamlessly integrates with other Azure services like Cosmos DB, Blob Storage, and Event Hubs, enabling the creation of complex workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Functions

  • Cold Start Latency
    Functions in a serverless environment can experience latency during initial invocation after being dormant, which might impact performance for time-sensitive applications.
  • Execution Timeout
    Azure Functions have a maximum execution timeout, which can be limiting for long-running processes and might require architectural adjustments.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Leveraging Azure-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it difficult to migrate to other cloud platforms without significant refactoring.
  • Limited Debugging and Monitoring
    Debugging Azure Functions can be less straightforward compared to traditional applications, with constraints in local debugging and monitoring capabilities.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    The pricing model can become complex, especially for applications with unpredictable workloads, making it challenging to estimate costs accurately.

Fission.io features and specs

  • Decentralized Hosting
    Fission.io offers decentralized web hosting, which means your data can be distributed across multiple nodes, enhancing redundancy and accessibility.
  • No Backend Required
    Fission provides a platform that allows for serverless applications, eliminating the need for traditional backend infrastructure and simplifying development.
  • Portable and Interoperable
    Applications built on Fission can easily be moved and run across different platforms and environments, enhancing flexibility and interoperability with other systems.
  • Built-in Data Ownership
    Fission emphasizes data ownership, giving users control over their data by keeping it on their own devices or selectively choosing where it is stored.
  • Progressive Web Apps (PWA) Support
    Fission.io supports PWAs, allowing developers to create web applications with rich, native-like features while leveraging the power of the decentralized web.

Possible disadvantages of Fission.io

  • Limited Ecosystem
    As a relatively new platform, Fission.io has a smaller community and fewer third-party integrations compared to more established competitors.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers not familiar with decentralized and serverless architectures may face a learning curve when adopting Fission.io.
  • Performance Variability
    Decentralized hosting can sometimes result in variable performance due to the distributed nature of storage and computation resources.
  • Dependency on Browser Support
    Some features of Fission.io rely on modern browser capabilities, which may cause compatibility issues with older or less popular web browsers.
  • Market Adoption Risk
    As a platform that hinges on decentralized technology, Fission.io may face challenges in gaining widespread adoption in industries resistant to change.

Azure Functions videos

How to build a movie review app with Azure Cosmos DB and Azure Functions | Azure Makers Series

More videos:

  • Review - Go serverless: Event-driven applications with Azure Functions | Azure Friday
  • Review - Azure Friday | Serverless Apps with Azure Cosmos DB and Azure Functions

Fission.io videos

No Fission.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Functions and Fission.io)
Cloud Hosting
52 52%
48% 48
Cloud Computing
46 46%
54% 54
App Deployment
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Functions and Fission.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Azure Functions and Fission.io

Azure Functions Reviews

Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Azure Functions is particularly useful for developers working with .NET technologies or those already using Azure services.
Source: signoz.io

Fission.io Reviews

We have no reviews of Fission.io yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Fission.io should be more popular than Azure Functions. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Functions mentions (3)

  • Manage serverless APIs with Apache APISIX
    This article shows with the simple example how to manage Java-based serverless APIs build with Azure functions. It uses azure-functions plugin to integrate Apache APISIX API Gateway with Azure Serverless Function that invokes the HTTP trigger functions and return the response from Azure Cloud. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • The Power of GitHub Actions for Streamlining DevOps Workflows
    GitHub Actions for Azure: This GitHub Action allows developers to automate tasks on the Microsoft Azure platform. With this action, developers can easily integrate Azure services into their workflows, such as Azure Functions, App Services, and Kubernetes. This can help streamline DevOps workflows by automating tasks such as deployment, testing, and scaling on the Azure platform. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • NoOps: What Does the Future Hold for DevOps Engineers?
    NoOps is best suited for born-in-the-cloud environments that leverage PaaS and serverless solutions. Microservices and API-based application architectures fit the bill perfectly, as they offer fine-grained modularity along with automation. Leading cloud service providers like AWS, Azure, and GCP have a laser focus on providing more services and capabilities in PaaS and serverless, which would help accelerate the... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

Fission.io mentions (5)

  • A Brief History Of Serverless
    The FaaS platform gained a lot of popularity which resulted in many competitors. There was OSS providers like OpenFaaS or Fission. There were of course the commercial versions to like Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Questions for Heroku-like Project
    This is where I see K8S coming in – teachers can provide dev deployments that are setup for students to learn. Teachers can also provide containers that run automated tests against the student containers for assessment! Plus, we can smooth over some of the git workflow stuff for the ripest of beginners; we can integrate with github to sync their work on our platform to repositories on their github account, so that... Source: about 2 years ago
  • I'd like to execute a serverless function every time a message is written to a RabbitMQ or Kafka - what's the self-hosted equivalent of AWS Lambda + SNS/SQS or Azure Functions + ASQ/ASB?
    I use https://fission.io/ on Kubernetes to emulate AWS Lambda + API Gateway to run Python functions. I use their YAML Spec functionality to deploy functions. It works well for my use case. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Give your users the power of JavaScript functions with Kubernetes and Fission.io
    After doing a lot of research, I ended up settling on the Fission.io framework to support this project. Fission is an open-source Serverless framework running in kubernetes. Think AWS Lambdas, but we are in control of every part of the infrastructure. Kubernetes gives us the power to define the environments the containers will be executed in, and any other resources they need. This gives us the control we need to... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Removing the split stat change does one thing that continues to kill off players.
    Nope. I was using https://fission.io/. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Functions and Fission.io, you can also consider the following products

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Google App Engine - A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Nuclio - Nuclio is an open source serverless platform.

Now Platform - Get native platform intelligence, so you can predict, prioritize, and proactively manage the work that matters most with the NOW Platform from ServiceNow.

Google Cloud Run - Bringing serverless to containers

Genezio - Effortlessly deploy faas apps on Genezio, eliminating server management. Enjoy seamless scaling, reduced costs, and increased flexibility with serverless.