Azure File Storage VS Uppy

Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: 11 months ago

​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: about 1 year ago

I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago

I agree with the SharePoint, though another option would be Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago

Look at https://uppy.io/ open source and lot of integrations. You can keep moving to different levels of abstraction as required and see some good practices of how things are done. - Source: Hacker News / 6 days ago

I just found uppy. This will be the next one I use. https://uppy.io/. Source: 11 months ago

I’m building a photo sharing website and want to make it incredibly easy to upload photos. Of course I could just utilize AWS official packages but that’s pretty bare bones. I could also use next-s3-upload which is purpose built for Next and simplifies some things but is still fairly basic. But then there’s things like uppy that provides everything you’d ever need in an uploaded (third party sources, camera, etc.)... Source: about 1 year ago

Media file uploads with the Uppy JavaScript uploader plugin. Source: about 1 year ago

I would look at Uppy.js, I've used it in an enterprise application and it works super well, makes it super easy to do what you're trying to achieve with progress bars for each file. Source: over 1 year ago