Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: 12 months ago

​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: about 1 year ago

I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago

I agree with the SharePoint, though another option would be Azure Files. Source: almost 2 years ago

Oracle, AWS & Azure all have "Cloud at Customer" offerings. And these offerings have existed for years. https://www.oracle.com/cloud/cloud-at-customer/ https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/azure-stack https://aws.amazon.com/outposts/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Riot already uses AWS’ services across its games to focus on how it designs and deploys content to help provide the best possible game experience, using edge computing like AWS Outposts and AWS Local Zones. Riot aims for latency under 80 milliseconds for League of Legends, and under 35 milliseconds for Valorant. Now Riot is going to use AWS to enhance its esports broadcasts throughout each competitive season for... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

Now you pay the cloud to come to you. Source: 12 months ago

They already do ^_^. AWS Outpost[1] [1]: https://aws.amazon.com/outposts/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Also: https://aws.amazon.com/outposts/. Source: about 1 year ago