Azure File Storage VS Amazon FSx for Lustre

Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: 11 months ago

​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: about 1 year ago

I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: about 1 year ago

I agree with the SharePoint, though another option would be Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago

I think theres an interesting story in software ecosystems where there are two flavors of applications (which coexist) that prefer object stores over filesystems and vice versa. Good reference point for this I think exists in many modern video transcoding infrastructures. Using something like FSx [1] gives you a performant option for the use cases when the tooling involved prefers filesystem semantics. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Amazon FSx for Lustre high-performance Storage with Amazon EC2 Trn1 instances, powered by AWS Trainium accelerators, are purpose built for high-performance (DL) training while offering up to 50% cost-to-train savings over comparable GPU-based instances. Trn1 instance supports up to 800 Gbps of Elastic Fabric Adapter networking bandwidth. Each Trn1 instance also supports up to 80 Gbps of Amazon Elastic Block Store... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago