Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Container Instances VS DepHell

Compare Azure Container Instances VS DepHell and see what are their differences

Azure Container Instances logo Azure Container Instances

Easily run application containers in the cloud with a single command. Azure Container Instances lets you get started in seconds and lower your infrastructure costs with per-second billing.

DepHell logo DepHell

:package: :fire: Python project management. Manage packages: convert between formats, lock, install, resolve, isolate, test, build graph, show outdated, audit. Manage venvs, build package, bump ver...
  • Azure Container Instances Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05
  • DepHell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28

Azure Container Instances features and specs

  • Simplified Deployment
    Azure Container Instances allows for quick and easy deployment of containers without the need for managing virtual machines or orchestrators.
  • Scalability
    ACIs can be scaled up or down based on demand, providing flexibility and cost-efficiency for varying workloads.
  • Cost-Effective
    You only pay for the compute resources you use, making it ideal for quick tasks and short-lived workloads.
  • Integration with Azure Services
    ACIs can be easily integrated with other Azure services such as Azure Virtual Networks, Azure Monitor, and Azure Logs for comprehensive cloud solutions.
  • Fast Start-up
    Containers start quickly in ACIs, allowing for rapid scaling and fast execution of workloads.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Container Instances

  • Limited Orchestration
    ACIs lack the advanced orchestration capabilities seen in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) or other orchestrators, which may be necessary for complex applications.
  • Statefulness Limitations
    ACIs are best suited for stateless applications. Managing stateful applications may require additional services and configurations.
  • Not Ideal for Long-Running Workloads
    Though cost-effective for short tasks, ACIs may become expensive for long-running applications compared to other container solutions.
  • Limited Customization
    ACIs provide fewer customization options in terms of infrastructure and configurations compared to managing your own VMs or using AKS.
  • Networking Constraints
    While ACIs integrate with virtual networks, there are limitations on advanced networking features, which might be crucial for complex network architectures.

DepHell features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Azure Container Instances videos

Azure Container Instances Tutorial | Serverless containers in cloud

More videos:

  • Review - Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) & Azure Container Instances (ACI) For Beginners

DepHell videos

No DepHell videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Container Instances and DepHell)
Developer Tools
88 88%
12% 12
Workflow Automation
0 0%
100% 100
DevOps Tools
79 79%
21% 21
Containers As A Service
81 81%
19% 19

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Container Instances and DepHell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Container Instances should be more popular than DepHell. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Container Instances mentions (8)

  • Azure Container Instances vs Sliplane
    Azure Container Instances (ACI) and Sliplane both simplify deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications. However, there are some key differences, and both platforms serve different users and use cases. Let's compare them side by side. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • A Brief History Of Serverless
    This model was so successful that we started to see others create competitors such as AWS Fargate and Azure Container Instances. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Similar to AWS Fargate provider?
    Https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/container-instances and as /u/re-thc posted, GKE Autopilot can be that for Google Cloud. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Deploy Application on Azure App Services
    Containerize and deploy the application using one of the container delivery services on Azure like App Services, Container Instances, or Kubernetes Services. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Run Apache APISIX on Microsoft Azure Container Instance
    Apache APISIX is an open-source Microservice API gateway and platform designed for managing microservices requests of high availability, fault tolerance, and distributed system. You can install Apache APISIX by the different methods (Docker, Helm, or RPM) and run it in the various public cloud providers because of its cloud-native behavior. In this post, you will learn how easily run Apache APISIX API Gateway in... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

DepHell mentions (4)

  • How to generate setup.py from pyproject.toml
    I've found https://github.com/dephell/dephell but seems to be outdated. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Should i Continue this Project or Abandon it? ; https://github.com/iamDyeus/KnickAI
    I had a few relatively famous projects (like dephell), and at some point I lost my sleep because I was "fixing bugs" in it in my head in the middle of the night. Archiving it, closing issues in everything else, and starting to just write projects for my own fun only was the best decision I ever made. Don't make my mistakes. Don't ask random people on the internet what you should do. Do what you want to do and... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • PDM: A Modern Python Package Manager
    You jest and yet... https://github.com/dephell/dephell Dephell is a converter for python packaging systems. It can turn poetry files into requirements.txt, or setuptools' setup.py into pipenv's Pipfile etc. Python Packaging: There is More Than One Way to Do It. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • [D] What’s the simplest, most lightweight but complete and 100% open source MLOps toolkit? -> MY OWN CONCLUSIONS
    Not necessarily. You can use Dephell (https://github.com/dephell/dephell) to convert from poetry to the old-fashioned requirements.txt. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Container Instances and DepHell, you can also consider the following products

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

Metaflow - Framework for real-life data science; build, improve, and operate end-to-end workflows.

Google Kubernetes Engine - Google Kubernetes Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Set up a cluster in minutes.

Luigi - Luigi is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs.

Apache Mesos - Apache Mesos abstracts resources away from machines, enabling fault-tolerant and elastic distributed systems to easily be built and run effectively.

Azkaban - Azkaban is a batch workflow job scheduler created at LinkedIn to run Hadoop jobs.