Based on our record, AWS WAF should be more popular than Private Packagist. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You want to take the advantages of AWS WebApplication Firewall instead of CloudFlare WAF. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
If you aren't using API Gateway (REST API to be specific) your options are a bit more limited. You can get some benefit from WAF, though it's not really designed to be tenant-based. Still, it can help. Beyond that, you're mostly on your own. Keep in mind that anything you implement in your code is already sharing some amount of resources. Let's just hope AWS decides to add it to other places, like AppSync, in the... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
WAF is a Web Application Firewall, which allows the inspection of HTTP requests. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Add a firewall and other mechanisms for protecting your endpoints against malicious traffic and bots before it hits your workload and consumes those precious worker threads (e.g.: WAF). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
AWS WAF: The AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF) helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I was told in another forum to look at Private Packagist... But how is that different? Instead of installing packages from packagist.org.. You pay to Packagist.com to do the same thing? You just download from packagist.com cloud instead of packagist.org? Source: almost 2 years ago
We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 2 years ago
Https://packagist.com maybe tell them about a local packagist install. Source: almost 2 years ago
"[MANAGER] requested this to be done in PHP. You as IT will know that most modern programming and scripting languages work only with packaging software properly. Composer sends requests (majority of cases) to packagist.com and to github.com. It will add thousands of hours to do everything that composer does manually. Please sign here to authorize the usage of 4000 hours and the possible delay of 4000 hours.... Source: almost 2 years ago
Another downside that only really exists with non-PHP boilerplates is getting updates isn'T as easy. With PHP we're able to use packagist.com and make our code available via composer. Other languages don't have this so SaaS Pegasus provides zip downloads and Gravity provides access to a GitHub repo. This means you have to apply bug fixes yourself. With Parthenon, you do composer update and you'll get the latest... Source: about 2 years ago
OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and …
Satis - Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator
Let's Encrypt - Let’s Encrypt is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).
Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.
Sqreen - Sqreen is a web application security monitoring and protection solution helping companies protect their apps and users from attacks. Get started in minutes.
Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.