Based on our record, AWS Organizations should be more popular than NSQ. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
If you are working in a multi-account setup which should be the case if you run more than one workload in more than one SDLC stage, it is a best practice to use AWS Organizations to govern and manage your AWS accounts. Going further into the best practices, it is a a recommendation to have a separate Security or Audit AWS Account to manage your security services on the organizational scale. In that case, you... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
The solution here requires you to be using AWS Organizations to create AWS accounts for your developers. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
At this scale, operations can take a lot of time, because there are multiple operational tasks that we need to do when AWS accounts are leaving the AWS Organization or Teams are nuking the AWS account, StackSets Instances get drifted, because not all required resources for compliance can be secured ( SCP Limitations ), existing AWS accounts are joining the AWS Organization and all mandatory StackSets needs to be... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
AWS Organizations. (n.d.). Retrieved April 25, 2023, from https://aws.amazon.com/organizations/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
No doubt about it, AWS SSO (or should I say IAM Identity Centre?) is a great addition to the overall access management and security in AWS. But, as you mature in the cloud with a touch of AWS Organizations and dash of well-architected framework you'll soon have many AWS accounts and managing all of those accounts kind of sucks. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
(G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: about 1 year ago
Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.
ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.
RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.
Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.