Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS Greengrass VS Apache HTTP Server

Compare AWS Greengrass VS Apache HTTP Server and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

AWS Greengrass logo AWS Greengrass

Local compute, messaging, data caching, and synch capabilities for connected devices

Apache HTTP Server logo Apache HTTP Server

Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996
  • AWS Greengrass Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-28
  • Apache HTTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21

AWS Greengrass features and specs

  • Edge Computing
    AWS Greengrass allows devices to process data locally without relying on cloud resources, reducing latency and ensuring continued operation even with intermittent connectivity.
  • Seamless AWS Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with a variety of AWS services such as AWS Lambda, AWS IoT Core, and Amazon S3, allowing for enhanced functionality and simplified data exchange between edge devices and the cloud.
  • Security Features
    Offers robust security features, including data encryption for both in-transit and at-rest data, ensuring secure communication and data storage.
  • OTA Updates
    Provides over-the-air software updates, allowing developers to deploy new updates and patches to edge devices securely and efficiently.
  • Machine Learning at the Edge
    Supports ML inference capabilities, enabling machine learning models to run locally on devices, which is essential for real-time data processing and decision-making.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Greengrass

  • Complexity
    The integration of Greengrass in IoT solutions can add complexity, requiring a good understanding of both AWS services and edge computing.
  • Cost Considerations
    While processing data locally can reduce cloud costs, there may be additional expenses related to maintaining the hardware and ensuring compatibility with Greengrass, as well as costs associated with AWS usage.
  • Device Compatibility
    Not all devices may be compatible with AWS Greengrass, which may limit its use cases or require specific hardware configurations.
  • Dependency on AWS Ecosystem
    Being heavily integrated with the AWS ecosystem means that changes or outages in AWS services can potentially impact Greengrass deployments.
  • Learning Curve
    There may be a steep learning curve for developers who are new to AWS Greengrass, especially when it comes to deploying and managing complex IoT applications.

Apache HTTP Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a large, active community that contributes to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Apache is compatible with a variety of operating systems, including Unix, Linux, and Windows, providing flexibility and widespread usability.
  • Highly Customizable
    It offers a modular architecture that allows users to enable or disable features as needed, and to extend functionality through modules.
  • Robust Documentation
    Apache provides comprehensive and detailed documentation, which makes it easier for users to install, configure, and troubleshoot the server.
  • Widespread Adoption
    With its long history and widespread use, Apache has proven to be reliable and trusted by many organizations worldwide, ensuring a level of trust and stability.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Apache includes many features out-of-the-box, such as SSL/TLS support, URL redirection, authentication, load balancing, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HTTP Server

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to some lightweight web servers like Nginx, Apache can have higher memory and CPU usage, which may not be ideal for high concurrency needs.
  • Complex Configuration
    Apache's extensive customization options can lead to a complex configuration process, which may be challenging for beginners or those without specific expertise.
  • Less Efficient in Serving Static Content
    While Apache is highly capable, it may be less efficient at serving static content compared to specialized web servers like Nginx.
  • Initial Learning Curve
    Due to its rich features and configurability, new users might face a steep learning curve when first setting up and using Apache HTTP Server.
  • Module Compatibility Issues
    Sometimes, third-party modules may not always be compatible with the latest versions of Apache, causing potential integration issues.

AWS Greengrass videos

Run ML Models at the Edge with AWS Greengrass ML

Apache HTTP Server videos

No Apache HTTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS Greengrass and Apache HTTP Server)
Data Dashboard
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
IoT Platform
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS Greengrass and Apache HTTP Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS Greengrass and Apache HTTP Server

AWS Greengrass Reviews

We have no reviews of AWS Greengrass yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
However, compared to XAMPP and other popular web servers in the market Apache HTTP Server is a bit more complicated and is a little difficult to navigate for a complete newbie, but if you want to understand web development from the very fundamentals and understand how Apache as a web server software works then this software can be of great help to you.
Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
The most commonly used Web Server is by far Apache HTTP Server from the Software Apache Foundation. Created in 1995 by Rob McCool and Brian Behlendorf, among others. The name is a pun for A PatCHy server, as at the time of it’s inception, Apache was based on some existing code, along with some perhaps “hacky or clunky” software packages, enabling it to run. Additionally, the...
Source: chemicloud.com
10 Best alternatives of XAMPP servers for Windows, Linux and macOS
Apache is an open-source and free web server software that owns about 46% of websites worldwide. The official name is Apache HTTP Server and is maintained and developed by the Apache Software Foundation. This allows website owners to serve content on the web – hence the name “webserver”.
Top 5 open source web servers
As the Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server since 1996, it "benefits from great documentation and integrated support from other software projects." You can find more information on the Apache Foundation project page.
Source: opensource.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HTTP Server seems to be a lot more popular than AWS Greengrass. While we know about 67 links to Apache HTTP Server, we've tracked only 5 mentions of AWS Greengrass. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS Greengrass mentions (5)

  • Orchestrating Application Workloads in Distributed Embedded Systems: Setting up a Nomad Cluster with AWS IoT Greengrass - Part 1
    In this blog post series, we will demonstrate how to use AWS IoT Greengrass and Hashicorp Nomad to seamlessly interface with multiple interconnected devices and orchestrate service deployments on them. Greengrass will allow us to view the cluster as a single "Thing" from the cloud perspective, while Nomad will serve as the primary cluster orchestration tool. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • AWS Summit 2022 Australia and New Zealand - Day 2, AI/ML Edition
    AWS IoT Greengrass allows one to manage their IOT Edge devices, download ML models locally, so that inference can then be also be done locally. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Applying DevOps Principles to Robotics
    To assist in deployment and management of workloads in your fleet, it's worth taking advantage of a fleet or device management tool such as AWS GreenGrass, Formant or Rocos. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Machine Learning Best Practices for Public Sector Organizations
    In some cases, such as with edge devices, inferencing needs to occur even when there is limited or no connectivity to the cloud. Mining fields are an example of this type of use case. AWS IoT Greengrass enables ML inference locally using models that are created, trained, and optimized in the cloud using Amazon SageMaker, AWS Deep Learning AMI, or AWS Deep Learning Containers, and deployed on the edge devices. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Looking for a good IoT overview + a simple tutorial
    Take a look at Greengrass https://aws.amazon.com/greengrass/ Enables OTA updates and fleet management. Source: almost 4 years ago

Apache HTTP Server mentions (67)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS Greengrass and Apache HTTP Server, you can also consider the following products

Particle.io - Particle is an IoT platform enabling businesses to build, connect and manage their connected solutions.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

AWS IoT - Easily and securely connect devices to the cloud.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Azure IoT Hub - Manage billions of IoT devices with Azure IoT Hub, a cloud platform that lets you easily connect, monitor, provision, and configure IoT devices.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.