Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS CodePipeline VS IBM Cloud Object Storage

Compare AWS CodePipeline VS IBM Cloud Object Storage and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

AWS CodePipeline logo AWS CodePipeline

Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

IBM Cloud Object Storage logo IBM Cloud Object Storage

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a platform that offers cost-effective and scalable cloud storage for unstructured data.
  • AWS CodePipeline Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25
  • IBM Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

AWS CodePipeline features and specs

  • Integration with AWS Services
    AWS CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodeCommit, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy, enabling a smooth and coordinated CI/CD process.
  • Scalability
    AWS CodePipeline automatically scales with your development workflows, offering the scalability needed to handle varying workloads without manual intervention.
  • Automated Workflow
    CodePipeline allows for the creation of automated, repeatable workflows for building, testing, and deploying code, which reduces human error and increases efficiency.
  • Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
    The pricing model is pay-as-you-go, so you only pay for what you use, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes.
  • Built-In Security
    AWS CodePipeline offers built-in security features such as AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles, ensuring that your CI/CD process adheres to best security practices.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodePipeline

  • Learning Curve
    For those who are not familiar with AWS services, there can be a considerable learning curve to effectively utilize AWS CodePipeline.
  • Limited Customization
    While the service covers many use cases, it may offer limited customization options for highly specific or complex CI/CD workflows compared to other third-party tools.
  • Service Dependency
    Heavily relying on AWS CodePipeline ties your deployment pipeline to AWS, which can be limiting if you plan to use multi-cloud environments.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can occur when connecting with external repositories or third-party tools, impacting the speed of the deployment pipeline.
  • Costs for High Usage
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for many use cases, high-frequency usage can lead to significant costs over time, especially for large-scale enterprises.

IBM Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    IBM Cloud Object Storage offers very high scalability, allowing businesses to store large amounts of data easily. This flexibility is crucial for businesses that are growing their storage needs or have fluctuating demands.
  • Data Resiliency
    The service provides robust data resiliency options, including geo-dispersed storage configurations, enabling enhanced protection against data loss and improved availability.
  • Cost Efficiency
    With its flexible pricing model, businesses can choose options that best fit their budget, such as 'Pay-as-you-go' plans, thereby optimizing costs according to actual usage.
  • Security Features
    It comes with comprehensive security features, including encryption, access control, and integration with IAM policies, ensuring that data is protected both at rest and in transit.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with the broader IBM Cloud ecosystem, as well as other cloud services and applications, allows businesses to easily incorporate this storage solution into their existing cloud strategy.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Cloud Object Storage

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and customization options might lead to a steeper learning curve for new users or smaller teams without dedicated IT resources.
  • Performance Variability
    Depending on the region and specific use case, users might encounter variability in performance, particularly in scenarios requiring low-latency or high-throughput data access.
  • Support Availability
    While IBM offers various support plans, certain users might find the support mechanisms, such as community forums and basic plans, less responsive compared to some other providers.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although pricing models are flexible, they can also become complex and convoluted, making it difficult for some businesses to predict costs precisely without detailed monitoring and analysis.
  • Limited Proprietary Tooling
    Compared to some competitors, IBM might have fewer proprietary tools and native applications directly integrated with their cloud storage, potentially requiring additional third-party tools or custom development for specific needs.

AWS CodePipeline videos

AWS CodePipeline tutorial | Build a CI/CD Pipeline on AWS

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodePipeline - Continuous Delivery on Amazon Web Services
  • Review - AWS CodePipeline | AWS CodeDeploy | AWS CodeBuild | CodeCommit | Deploy WebApp a Hands on Lab
  • Review - Streamline Your Software Release Process Using AWS CodePipeline

IBM Cloud Object Storage videos

IBM Cloud Object Storage: Built for business

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with IBM Cloud Object Storage
  • Review - IBM Cloud Object Storage webinar

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS CodePipeline and IBM Cloud Object Storage)
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS CodePipeline and IBM Cloud Object Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS CodePipeline and IBM Cloud Object Storage

AWS CodePipeline Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service that easily and quickly automates your release pipelines for updates. Every time you change the code, AWS CodePipeline will build, test, and deploy your application. Also, it can be easily integrated with GitHub.

IBM Cloud Object Storage Reviews

We have no reviews of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodePipeline seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS CodePipeline mentions (29)

View more

IBM Cloud Object Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet. Tracking of IBM Cloud Object Storage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS CodePipeline and IBM Cloud Object Storage, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Alibaba Object Storage Service - Alibaba Object Storage Service is an encrypted and secure cloud storage service which stores, processes and accesses massive amounts of data

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.