Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS CodeArtifact VS AppImageKit

Compare AWS CodeArtifact VS AppImageKit and see what are their differences

AWS CodeArtifact logo AWS CodeArtifact

DevOps, Build, Test, Deploy, and Hosted Package Repository

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere
  • AWS CodeArtifact Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

AWS CodeArtifact videos

Introducing AWS CodeArtifact - AWS Online Tech Talks

More videos:

  • Review - First look at AWS CodeArtifact!
  • Review - AWS CodeArtifact - Primeiras impressões

AppImageKit videos

No AppImageKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS CodeArtifact and AppImageKit)
Package Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Developer Tools
32 32%
68% 68
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS CodeArtifact and AppImageKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppImageKit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 52 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS CodeArtifact mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AWS CodeArtifact yet. Tracking of AWS CodeArtifact recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AppImageKit mentions (52)

  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best CLI installation experience you've ever seen?
    There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Linux users when their preferred app isn't packaged in the main repository
    Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 11 months ago
  • How to minimize RAM usage during Go binary compilation
    Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS CodeArtifact and AppImageKit, you can also consider the following products

Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

packagecloud - Free hosted Node.js, Debian, RPM, Java, Python and RubyGem repositories. Chef, Puppet, Jenkins, Buildkite, CircleCI and Travis CI integrations.

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.