Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AutoMate BPA Server VS Control-M

Compare AutoMate BPA Server VS Control-M and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
The page you are looking for does not exist
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

AutoMate BPA Server logo AutoMate BPA Server

Workload Automation

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • AutoMate BPA Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-22
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

AutoMate BPA Server features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

AutoMate BPA Server videos

+ Add

Introduction to AutoMate BPA Server 8

Control-M videos

+ Add

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AutoMate BPA Server and Control-M)

AutoMate BPA Server

Control-M

API Tools
100 100%
API Tools
0% 0
IT Automation
6 6%
IT Automation
94% 94
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AutoMate BPA Server and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AutoMate BPA Server and Control-M

AutoMate BPA Server Reviews

We have no reviews of AutoMate BPA Server yet.
Be the first one to post

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
Source: research.aimultiple.com
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AutoMate BPA Server and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

UiPath Enterprise RPA Platform - The UiPath Enterprise RPA Platform is designed to support the full automation life cycle, and uses AI to uncover automation ideas for better RPA strategy.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

Loading...