Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register   |   Login

Autocrypt VS pep.security

Compare Autocrypt VS pep.security and see what are their differences


Convenient End-to-End Encryption for E-Mail

Privacy by Default.
Autocrypt Landing Page
Autocrypt Landing Page
pep.security Landing Page
pep.security Landing Page

p≡p closes the most threatening attack vectors for you and your company’s email communication, such as: - Attachment based attacks (ransomware, malicious email attachments, etc.) - URL based attacks (credential phishing, formjacking attacks, etc.) - Business Email Compromise (BEC), a social attack during which the attacker falsifies content, for instance bank account numbers on invoices - CEO fraud, another social attack in which the attacker impersonates the CEO

p≡p proposes easy and simple to implement solutions with a low TCO that offer: - No phishing with company email accounts on employees inside the company (eg. CEO fraud) - No phishing attacks on customers via company email accounts - No business email compromise with company email accounts on employees - No access to and no modification of email content by attackers - Guarantee to the client that only the recipient is able to read his or her email - Full GDPR and audit compliance

Autocrypt details

Categories
Security & Privacy Encryption File Encryption
Website autocrypt.org  
Platforms
-

pep.security details

Categories
Encryption Email Security Email Privacy Security & Privacy Anti-Phishing Message Encryption
Website pep.security  
Platforms
Outlook Android iOS Thunderbird

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Autocrypt and pep.security)
56
56%
44%
44
45
45%
55%
55
58
58%
42%
42
100
100%
0%
0

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Autocrypt and pep.security

Autocrypt Reviews

15 Grammarly Alternatives to Fix Your Writing Mistakes in 2021 ( Spelling, Punctuation, and More)
If you’re a novelist and looking for a smart writing tool that includes the cool features to help in proofreading your prose, you are just at the right place. AutoCrypt is an impressive alternative to Grammarly that works as a substitute for an in-person close reading. It helps you detect issues with your word selection, pacing, and provides an excellent report on how to...

pep.security Reviews

We have no reviews of pep.security yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Autocrypt seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Autocrypt mentions (6)

  • The new ProtonMail has passed its independent security audit
    > a new protocol that can degrade gracefully Does Autocrypt meet that definition? https://autocrypt.org/ Sadly, for the last 3 years, ProtonMail has resisted implementing it (unlike Posteo, for example), using FUD tactics to justify themselves: https://github.com/ProtonMail/WebClient/issues/120. - Source: Hacker News / 16 days ago
  • PGP Marks 30th Anniversary
    If we're sharing obligatory links, then a detailed critique of "The PGP Problem" is: https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=pgpfan:tpp It's true, though, that much work is needed to bring PGP up to the levels expected of modern crypto tools. Hopefully some of that will happen as a result of the work happening in the IETF: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-03.html and due to technology... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • IMAP connection
    I think Autocrypt is meant to help address this issue, but not 100% sure. Someone, please correct me if this is wrong. - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
  • Question: Seemless Email Encryption
    It sounds like what you want should be doable, although I suspect it takes multiple parts working together. As for the sending messages part, one option is autocrypt, which I learned about from Mailpile (linked elsewhere in other comments). There are arguably more secure options, but autocrypt does make it easy to send encrypted emails (and switch to encryption when someone else starts encrypting their emails. - Source: Reddit / 5 months ago

pep.security mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of pep.security yet. Tracking of pep.security recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Autocrypt and pep.security, you can also consider the following products

Kleopatra - Kleopatra is a certificate manager and GUI for GnuPG.

GPG Suite - Use GPG Suite to encrypt, decrypt, sign and verify files or messages.

GnuPG - GnuPG is a complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC4880 (also known as PGP).

PGP Tool - PGPTool allows you to encrypt and decrypt files. It's free and easy to use.

GPG4Win - GPG4Win is an encryption program for files and emails. The program encrypts emails and files so that they can only be read by those intended to receive them.

Encrypto - Encrypto lets you encrypt files before sending them to friends or coworkers.

User reviews

Share your experience with using Autocrypt and pep.security. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review